FKGRX vs. FKTFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX) and Franklin California Tax Free Income Fund (FKTFX).
FKGRX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Apr 1, 1948. FKTFX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jan 30, 1977.
Performance
FKGRX vs. FKTFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FKGRX vs. FKTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FKGRX Franklin Growth Fund | -4.60% | 15.38% | 17.96% | 27.54% | -25.32% | 21.61% | 30.71% | 32.08% | -3.37% | 26.31% |
FKTFX Franklin California Tax Free Income Fund | -0.13% | 4.38% | 2.78% | 6.25% | -10.31% | 1.80% | 5.29% | 9.73% | 0.31% | 6.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FKGRX achieves a -4.60% return, which is significantly lower than FKTFX's -0.13% return. Over the past 10 years, FKGRX has outperformed FKTFX with an annualized return of 13.03%, while FKTFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.36% annualized return.
FKGRX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -4.48%
- YTD
- -4.60%
- 6M
- -3.90%
- 1Y
- 21.01%
- 3Y*
- 14.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.76%
- 10Y*
- 13.03%
FKTFX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 1.58%
- 1Y
- 3.13%
- 3Y*
- 3.55%
- 5Y*
- 0.92%
- 10Y*
- 2.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FKGRX vs. FKTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FKGRX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FKTFX's 0.62% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FKGRX vs. FKTFX — Risk / Return Rank
FKGRX
FKTFX
FKGRX vs. FKTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX) and Franklin California Tax Free Income Fund (FKTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FKGRX | FKTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 0.70 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 0.95 | +0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.19 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 0.71 | +0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.21 | 2.00 | +3.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FKGRX | FKTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 0.70 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.21 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.50 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.62 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between FKGRX and FKTFX is 0.00, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FKGRX vs. FKTFX - Dividend Comparison
FKGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.06%, more than FKTFX's 3.79% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FKGRX Franklin Growth Fund | 15.06% | 14.37% | 8.34% | 6.26% | 10.49% | 9.19% | 7.97% | 5.75% | 1.65% | 2.38% | 3.26% | 3.88% |
FKTFX Franklin California Tax Free Income Fund | 3.79% | 4.96% | 4.22% | 3.20% | 3.29% | 2.68% | 2.91% | 3.85% | 3.58% | 3.58% | 3.65% | 3.93% |
Drawdowns
FKGRX vs. FKTFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FKGRX drawdown since its inception was -51.08%, which is greater than FKTFX's maximum drawdown of -31.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKGRX and FKTFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FKGRX | FKTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.08% | -31.16% | -19.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -5.29% | -6.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.22% | -16.21% | -16.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.52% | -16.21% | -16.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.68% | -2.33% | -5.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.76% | -6.11% | -0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 1.87% | +1.26% |
Volatility
FKGRX vs. FKTFX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX) has a higher volatility of 5.83% compared to Franklin California Tax Free Income Fund (FKTFX) at 1.23%. This indicates that FKGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FKTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FKGRX | FKTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.83% | 1.23% | +4.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.48% | 1.98% | +8.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.92% | 5.40% | +13.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.61% | 4.46% | +15.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 4.74% | +14.76% |