PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJUN vs. TDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FJUN vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJUN achieves a 4.64% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV's 30.57% return.


FJUN

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.03%
YTD
4.64%
6M
5.30%
1Y
13.82%
3Y*
14.38%
5Y*
11.05%
10Y*

TDIV

1D
-1.79%
1M
15.82%
YTD
30.57%
6M
28.79%
1Y
53.63%
3Y*
33.27%
5Y*
19.29%
10Y*
19.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJUN vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FJUN
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June
4.64%11.05%16.38%22.30%-4.95%11.47%11.67%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
30.57%25.27%24.43%36.71%-22.13%29.49%20.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FJUN and TDIV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2020

0.84

The correlation between FJUN and TDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FJUN vs. TDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FJUN
TDIV

Technology

36.2%
85.0%

Financial Services

11.9%

-

Communication Services

10.9%
13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

8.1%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

FJUN
36.2%
TDIV
85.0%

Financial Services

FJUN
11.9%
TDIV

-

Communication Services

FJUN
10.9%
TDIV
13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FJUN
10.1%
TDIV

-

Healthcare

FJUN
8.4%
TDIV

-

Industrials

FJUN
8.1%
TDIV
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

FJUN
4.9%
TDIV

-

Energy

FJUN
3.5%
TDIV

-

Utilities

FJUN
2.3%
TDIV

-

Real Estate

FJUN
1.9%
TDIV

-

Basic Materials

FJUN
1.8%
TDIV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FJUN vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJUN
FJUN Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

TDIV
TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJUN vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FJUNTDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.49

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

5.02

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.98

15.64

+3.35

FJUN vs. TDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJUN Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the TDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJUN and TDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FJUNTDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.93

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

0.94

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.88

+0.29

Drawdowns

FJUN vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJUN drawdown since its inception was -13.26%, smaller than the maximum TDIV drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJUN and TDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FJUNTDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.26%

-31.97%

+18.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.13%

-10.74%

+6.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.26%

-23.00%

+9.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.26%

-31.97%

+18.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-1.79%

+1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.67%

-4.84%

+3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

3.44%

-2.71%

Volatility

FJUN vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) is 0.41%, while First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that FJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FJUNTDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.41%

6.86%

-6.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.35%

13.91%

-9.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.11%

18.47%

-12.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.55%

20.67%

-10.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.27%

20.85%

-10.58%

FJUN vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJUN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FJUN vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison

FJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FJUN
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
1.12%1.40%1.59%1.74%2.51%1.76%2.07%2.27%2.97%2.27%2.45%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


FJUN and TDIV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDIV has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to FJUN (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJUN dropped -13.26% vs TDIV's -31.97%.

On 5-year performance, TDIV leads with 19.29% vs 11.05% for FJUN. On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 19.29% return vs 11.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FJUN.

TDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for FJUN.

FJUN is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TDIV is Technology Equities. FJUN tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June, while TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FJUN and 0.50% for TDIV.

TDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FJUN and TDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer