FJUN vs. SCHX
FJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - FJUN tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June while SCHX tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FJUN returned 11.05%/yr vs 13.29%/yr for SCHX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FJUN charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
FJUN vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FJUN achieves a 4.64% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 10.72% return.
FJUN
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 4.64%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- 13.82%
- 3Y*
- 14.38%
- 5Y*
- 11.05%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 27.36%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.41%
FJUN vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June | 4.64% | 11.05% | 16.38% | 22.30% | -4.95% | 11.47% | 11.67% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 10.72% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 23.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between FJUN and SCHX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2020 | 0.95 |
The correlation between FJUN and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
FJUN vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FJUN
SCHX
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
FJUN
SCHX
Financial Services
FJUN
SCHX
Communication Services
FJUN
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
FJUN
SCHX
Healthcare
FJUN
SCHX
Industrials
FJUN
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
FJUN
SCHX
Energy
FJUN
SCHX
Utilities
FJUN
SCHX
Real Estate
FJUN
SCHX
Basic Materials
FJUN
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FJUN vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
FJUN
SCHX
FJUN vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FJUN | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.41 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 3.05 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.98 | 13.85 | +5.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FJUN | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.29 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 0.78 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 0.85 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
FJUN vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FJUN drawdown since its inception was -13.26%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJUN and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FJUN | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.26% | -34.33% | +21.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.13% | -9.02% | +4.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.26% | -19.04% | +5.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.26% | -25.41% | +12.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -0.70% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -3.97% | +2.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 1.98% | -1.25% |
Volatility
FJUN vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) is 0.41%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that FJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FJUN | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.41% | 2.91% | -2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.35% | 9.02% | -4.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.11% | 11.99% | -5.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.55% | 17.12% | -6.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.27% | 18.15% | -7.88% |
FJUN vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FJUN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FJUN vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
FJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FJUN and SCHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to FJUN (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJUN dropped -13.26% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 5-year performance, SCHX leads with 13.29% vs 11.05% for FJUN. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 13.29% return vs 11.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FJUN.
SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for FJUN.
FJUN tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FJUN and 0.03% for SCHX.
SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FJUN and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer