FJUN vs. IBIC
FJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FJUN is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FJUN returned 14.16% vs 4.38% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. FJUN charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
FJUN vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FJUN achieves a 4.84% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.39% return.
FJUN
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 4.78%
- 1Y
- 14.16%
- 3Y*
- 13.60%
- 5Y*
- 10.79%
- 10Y*
- —
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FJUN vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June | 4.84% | 11.05% | 16.38% | 5.13% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.39% | 4.96% | 5.25% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between FJUN and IBIC is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | -0.03 |
The correlation between FJUN and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FJUN vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
FJUN
IBIC
FJUN vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FJUN | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 2.21 | -0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 16.41 | -12.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.85 | 58.11 | -38.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FJUN vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FJUN drawdown since its inception was -13.26%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJUN and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FJUN | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.26% | -0.90% | -12.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.13% | -0.27% | -3.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -0.11% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.66% | -0.10% | -1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 0.08% | +0.64% |
Volatility
FJUN vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) has a higher volatility of 0.44% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.16%. This indicates that FJUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FJUN | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.44% | 0.16% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.33% | 0.67% | +3.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.61% | 0.89% | +4.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.55% | 1.57% | +8.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.24% | 1.57% | +8.67% |
FJUN vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FJUN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
FJUN vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
FJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.59% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FJUN and IBIC have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FJUN has higher volatility (0.44%) compared to IBIC (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJUN dropped -13.26% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, FJUN leads with 14.16% vs 4.38% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FJUN has performed better with a 14.16% return vs 4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FJUN.
IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.00% for FJUN.
FJUN is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. FJUN tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FJUN and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FJUN and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer