PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJUN vs. DJUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FJUN vs. DJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FJUN vs. DJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FJUN
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June
-0.44%11.05%16.38%22.30%-4.95%11.47%11.67%
DJUN
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June
-0.21%9.38%13.92%17.58%-6.30%6.27%6.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJUN achieves a -0.44% return, which is significantly lower than DJUN's -0.21% return.


FJUN

1D
0.54%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
-0.44%
6M
1.41%
1Y
13.35%
3Y*
14.07%
5Y*
10.17%
10Y*

DJUN

1D
0.43%
1M
-0.96%
YTD
-0.21%
6M
1.56%
1Y
12.29%
3Y*
11.49%
5Y*
7.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FJUN vs. DJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FJUN and DJUN have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Return for Risk

FJUN vs. DJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJUN
FJUN Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

DJUN
DJUN Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJUN vs. DJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FJUNDJUNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.17

1.22

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.79

1.85

-0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.33

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

1.53

+0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.66

8.47

+1.19

FJUN vs. DJUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJUN Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the DJUN Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJUN and DJUN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FJUNDJUNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.22

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.88

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.97

+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between FJUN and DJUN is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FJUN vs. DJUN - Dividend Comparison

Neither FJUN nor DJUN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FJUN vs. DJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJUN drawdown since its inception was -13.26%, which is greater than DJUN's maximum drawdown of -11.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJUN and DJUN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FJUNDJUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.26%

-11.96%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.40%

-7.33%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.26%

-11.96%

-1.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-1.18%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.72%

-1.64%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

1.33%

+0.11%

Volatility

FJUN vs. DJUN - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) has a higher volatility of 3.36% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) at 2.86%. This indicates that FJUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FJUNDJUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

2.86%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.70%

3.79%

+0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.44%

10.23%

+1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.53%

8.50%

+2.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.39%

8.16%

+2.23%