FJUL vs. MRCP

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FJUL (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July) and MRCP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March) are both Options Trading funds. FJUL is passively managed, while MRCP is actively managed. Over the past year, FJUL returned 16.33% vs 15.46% for MRCP. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FJUL charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MRCP.

Performance

FJUL vs. MRCP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (FJUL) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJUL achieves a 5.84% return, which is significantly lower than MRCP's 6.48% return.

FJUL

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 5.84%
• 6M: 5.40%
• 1Y: 16.33%
• 3Y*: 15.99%
• 5Y*: 11.37%
• 10Y*: —

MRCP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.44%
• YTD: 6.48%
• 6M: 6.35%
• 1Y: 15.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJUL vs. MRCP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FJUL FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July	5.84%	14.19%	12.29%
MRCP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March	6.48%	14.13%	11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FJUL and MRCP is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2024	0.95

The correlation between FJUL and MRCP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FJUL vs. MRCP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJUL

FJUL Risk / Return Rank: 84
FJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 88

MRCP

MRCP Risk / Return Rank: 86
MRCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
MRCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
MRCP Omega Ratio Rank: 91
MRCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
MRCP Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJUL vs. MRCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (FJUL) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FJUL	MRCP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	2.46	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.48	3.59	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.51	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.22	3.23	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.91	18.02	-1.11

FJUL vs. MRCP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the MRCP Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJUL and MRCP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FJUL vs. MRCP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJUL drawdown since its inception was -13.08%, which is greater than MRCP's maximum drawdown of -10.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJUL and MRCP.

Drawdown Indicators

	FJUL	MRCP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.08%	-10.73%	-2.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.10%	-4.81%	-0.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.08%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.37%	-0.95%	+0.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.86%	-0.77%	-1.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.97%	0.86%	+0.11%

Volatility

FJUL vs. MRCP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (FJUL) is 1.26%, while PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP) has a volatility of 1.98%. This indicates that FJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRCP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FJUL	MRCP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.26%	1.98%	-0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.14%	5.24%	-0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.81%	6.30%	+0.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.97%	9.23%	+1.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.52%	9.23%	+1.29%

FJUL vs. MRCP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJUL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MRCP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FJUL vs. MRCP - Dividend Comparison

Neither FJUL nor MRCP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FJUL and MRCP in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, FJUL and MRCP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FJUL or MRCP?

MRCP has higher volatility (1.98%) compared to FJUL (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJUL dropped -13.08% vs MRCP's -10.73%.

Which ETF is better, FJUL or MRCP?

On 1-year performance, FJUL leads with 16.33% vs 15.46% for MRCP. On fees, MRCP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FJUL has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FJUL or MRCP?

Over the 1-year period, FJUL has performed better with a 16.33% return vs 15.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FJUL or MRCP?

MRCP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FJUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FJUL or MRCP?

FJUL and MRCP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FJUL and MRCP?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FJUL and 0.50% for MRCP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MRCP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.