PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJPS.L vs. JPNL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FJPS.L vs. JPNL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FJPS.L) and Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (JPNL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FJPS.L is traded in GBP, while JPNL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JPNL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJPS.L achieves a 16.69% return, which is significantly higher than JPNL.L's 14.78% return.


FJPS.L

1D
0.27%
1M
7.52%
YTD
16.69%
6M
15.62%
1Y
33.78%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
10.03%
10Y*

JPNL.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
5.50%
YTD
14.78%
6M
14.36%
1Y
31.62%
3Y*
14.93%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*
9.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJPS.L vs. JPNL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FJPS.L
Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc
16.69%14.84%8.88%12.32%-5.11%2.90%1.92%
JPNL.L
Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR
14.78%17.96%7.74%12.66%-5.98%1.37%1.56%

Correlation

The correlation between FJPS.L and JPNL.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2020

0.77

The correlation between FJPS.L and JPNL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (5 years) to 0.89 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FJPS.L vs. JPNL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FJPS.L
JPNL.L

Industrials

21.9%
26.9%

Technology

19.8%
17.7%

Financial Services

18.9%
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
12.1%

Communication Services

9.0%
7.8%

Healthcare

6.1%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
4.2%

Basic Materials

4.0%
4.7%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.8%

Energy

1.8%
0.9%

Utilities

0.8%
1.3%

Industrials

FJPS.L
21.9%
JPNL.L
26.9%

Technology

FJPS.L
19.8%
JPNL.L
17.7%

Financial Services

FJPS.L
18.9%
JPNL.L
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FJPS.L
11.4%
JPNL.L
12.1%

Communication Services

FJPS.L
9.0%
JPNL.L
7.8%

Healthcare

FJPS.L
6.1%
JPNL.L
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

FJPS.L
4.2%
JPNL.L
4.2%

Basic Materials

FJPS.L
4.0%
JPNL.L
4.7%

Real Estate

FJPS.L
2.0%
JPNL.L
1.8%

Energy

FJPS.L
1.8%
JPNL.L
0.9%

Utilities

FJPS.L
0.8%
JPNL.L
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FJPS.L vs. JPNL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJPS.L
FJPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FJPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FJPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

JPNL.L
JPNL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
JPNL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPNL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPNL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
JPNL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPNL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJPS.L vs. JPNL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FJPS.L) and Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (JPNL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FJPS.LJPNL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.37

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

3.26

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.51

9.96

+0.56

FJPS.L vs. JPNL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJPS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the JPNL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJPS.L and JPNL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FJPS.LJPNL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

1.93

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.74

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.73

-0.14

Drawdowns

FJPS.L vs. JPNL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJPS.L drawdown since its inception was -17.38%, smaller than the maximum JPNL.L drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJPS.L and JPNL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FJPS.LJPNL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.38%

-25.42%

+8.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.50%

-10.63%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.34%

-13.44%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.38%

-18.53%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.35%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.17%

-5.36%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

3.37%

-0.17%

Volatility

FJPS.L vs. JPNL.L - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FJPS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (JPNL.L) at 3.61%. This indicates that FJPS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPNL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FJPS.LJPNL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.30%

3.61%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.08%

14.26%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.44%

17.96%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.10%

18.30%

-2.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.90%

17.84%

-1.94%

FJPS.L vs. JPNL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJPS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than JPNL.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FJPS.L vs. JPNL.L - Dividend Comparison

FJPS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JPNL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FJPS.L
Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JPNL.L
Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR
0.62%0.71%0.74%1.23%1.83%1.37%1.14%1.98%1.84%1.43%1.96%1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


FJPS.L and JPNL.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FJPS.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FJPS.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for JPNL.L.

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: FIL Investment Management (Luxembourg) S.A., Irela and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FJPS.L and 0.45% for JPNL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FJPS.L and JPNL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer