FJPS.L vs. EEJG.L
FJPS.L (Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc) and EEJG.L (iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Japan Equities funds tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, from FIL Investment Management (Luxembourg) S.A., Irela and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FJPS.L returned 10.03%/yr vs 9.31%/yr for EEJG.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FJPS.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for EEJG.L.
Performance
FJPS.L vs. EEJG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FJPS.L achieves a 16.69% return, which is significantly higher than EEJG.L's 15.84% return.
FJPS.L
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 7.52%
- YTD
- 16.69%
- 6M
- 15.62%
- 1Y
- 33.78%
- 3Y*
- 14.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.03%
- 10Y*
- —
EEJG.L
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- 15.84%
- 6M
- 15.60%
- 1Y
- 34.38%
- 3Y*
- 14.25%
- 5Y*
- 9.31%
- 10Y*
- —
FJPS.L vs. EEJG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJPS.L Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc | 16.69% | 14.84% | 8.88% | 12.32% | -5.11% | 2.90% | 1.92% |
EEJG.L iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 15.84% | 17.60% | 6.43% | 13.48% | -8.04% | 1.83% | 1.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between FJPS.L and EEJG.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2020 | 0.97 |
The correlation between FJPS.L and EEJG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
FJPS.L vs. EEJG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FJPS.L
EEJG.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
FJPS.L
EEJG.L
Technology
FJPS.L
EEJG.L
Financial Services
FJPS.L
EEJG.L
Consumer Cyclical
FJPS.L
EEJG.L
Communication Services
FJPS.L
EEJG.L
Healthcare
FJPS.L
EEJG.L
Consumer Defensive
FJPS.L
EEJG.L
Basic Materials
FJPS.L
EEJG.L
Real Estate
FJPS.L
EEJG.L
Energy
FJPS.L
EEJG.L
Utilities
FJPS.L
EEJG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FJPS.L vs. EEJG.L — Risk / Return Rank
FJPS.L
EEJG.L
FJPS.L vs. EEJG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FJPS.L) and iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEJG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FJPS.L | EEJG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.35 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 3.01 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.51 | 9.84 | +0.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FJPS.L | EEJG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 1.82 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.58 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.66 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
FJPS.L vs. EEJG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FJPS.L drawdown since its inception was -17.38%, smaller than the maximum EEJG.L drawdown of -19.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJPS.L and EEJG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FJPS.L | EEJG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.38% | -19.37% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.50% | -11.39% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.34% | -13.99% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.38% | -19.37% | +1.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.30% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.17% | -5.78% | +0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 3.48% | -0.28% |
Volatility
FJPS.L vs. EEJG.L - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FJPS.L) and iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEJG.L) have volatilities of 4.30% and 4.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FJPS.L | EEJG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.30% | 4.29% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.08% | 15.23% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.44% | 18.80% | -0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.10% | 15.92% | +0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 15.99% | -0.09% |
FJPS.L vs. EEJG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FJPS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than EEJG.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FJPS.L vs. EEJG.L - Dividend Comparison
FJPS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EEJG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEJG.L iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.36% | 1.57% | 1.81% | 1.74% | 2.10% | 1.69% | 1.64% |
FJPS.L Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FJPS.L and EEJG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EEJG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EEJG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FJPS.L.
Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: FIL Investment Management (Luxembourg) S.A., Irela and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FJPS.L and 0.15% for EEJG.L.
Find the right allocation for FJPS.L and EEJG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer