PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJP vs. UTES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FJP vs. UTES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJP achieves a 12.56% return, which is significantly higher than UTES's 0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, FJP has underperformed UTES with an annualized return of 7.61%, while UTES has yielded a comparatively higher 12.27% annualized return.


FJP

1D
1.05%
1M
-5.42%
YTD
12.56%
6M
11.54%
1Y
31.75%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
7.61%

UTES

1D
1.56%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
0.26%
6M
0.49%
1Y
8.95%
3Y*
22.00%
5Y*
15.32%
10Y*
12.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJP vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FJP
First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund
12.56%33.60%5.80%23.00%-12.83%-1.13%3.60%7.72%-18.60%27.63%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
0.26%25.71%45.35%-2.46%0.80%20.74%-0.30%25.48%5.14%14.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FJP and UTES is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015

0.22

FJP vs. UTES - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FJP
UTES

Industrials

45.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%

-

Basic Materials

9.7%

-

Technology

8.9%

-

Utilities

6.1%
100.0%

Financial Services

5.6%

-

Energy

4.2%

-

Healthcare

3.6%

-

Real Estate

3.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.8%

-

Communication Services

0.7%

-

Industrials

FJP
45.0%
UTES

-

Consumer Cyclical

FJP
12.0%
UTES

-

Basic Materials

FJP
9.7%
UTES

-

Technology

FJP
8.9%
UTES

-

Utilities

FJP
6.1%
UTES
100.0%

Financial Services

FJP
5.6%
UTES

-

Energy

FJP
4.2%
UTES

-

Healthcare

FJP
3.6%
UTES

-

Real Estate

FJP
3.5%
UTES

-

Consumer Defensive

FJP
0.8%
UTES

-

Communication Services

FJP
0.7%
UTES

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FJP vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJP
FJP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJP Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJP Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

UTES
UTES Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJP vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FJPUTESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.08

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

0.60

+1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.55

1.32

+5.23

FJP vs. UTES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJP Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is higher than the UTES Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJP and UTES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FJP vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJP drawdown since its inception was -41.51%, which is greater than UTES's maximum drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJP and UTES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FJPUTESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.51%

-35.39%

-6.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.43%

-13.88%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.02%

-17.62%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.88%

-20.40%

-11.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.51%

-35.39%

-6.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.75%

-9.10%

+1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.45%

-5.53%

-5.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.89%

6.29%

-1.40%

Volatility

FJP vs. UTES - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) have volatilities of 7.16% and 7.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FJPUTESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.16%

7.23%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.43%

17.05%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.00%

21.32%

-0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.43%

20.62%

-0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.91%

20.17%

-1.26%

FJP vs. UTES - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than UTES's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

FJP vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison

FJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than UTES's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FJP
First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund
2.53%2.68%3.18%3.49%2.21%2.43%0.99%2.80%1.54%1.29%1.46%0.85%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
1.49%1.42%1.51%2.44%2.13%1.94%2.09%1.84%2.09%3.44%3.53%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


FJP and UTES have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UTES has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to FJP (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJP dropped -41.51% vs UTES's -35.39%.

On 10-year performance, UTES leads with 12.27% vs 7.61% for FJP. On fees, UTES is cheaper at 0.49% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UTES has performed better with a 12.27% return vs 7.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UTES is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FJP.

FJP has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 1.49% for UTES.

FJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while UTES is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FJP and 0.49% for UTES.

FJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FJP and UTES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer