FJP vs. UTES
FJP (First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund) and UTES (Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Japan Index, while UTES is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners. FJP is passively managed, while UTES is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, FJP returned 7.61%/yr vs 12.27%/yr for UTES. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FJP charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for UTES.
Performance
FJP vs. UTES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FJP achieves a 12.56% return, which is significantly higher than UTES's 0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, FJP has underperformed UTES with an annualized return of 7.61%, while UTES has yielded a comparatively higher 12.27% annualized return.
FJP
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -5.42%
- YTD
- 12.56%
- 6M
- 11.54%
- 1Y
- 31.75%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 10.59%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
UTES
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 8.95%
- 3Y*
- 22.00%
- 5Y*
- 15.32%
- 10Y*
- 12.27%
FJP vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJP First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund | 12.56% | 33.60% | 5.80% | 23.00% | -12.83% | -1.13% | 3.60% | 7.72% | -18.60% | 27.63% |
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 0.26% | 25.71% | 45.35% | -2.46% | 0.80% | 20.74% | -0.30% | 25.48% | 5.14% | 14.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between FJP and UTES is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015 | 0.22 |
FJP vs. UTES - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FJP
UTES
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
FJP
UTES
-
Consumer Cyclical
FJP
UTES
-
Basic Materials
FJP
UTES
-
Technology
FJP
UTES
-
Utilities
FJP
UTES
Financial Services
FJP
UTES
-
Energy
FJP
UTES
-
Healthcare
FJP
UTES
-
Real Estate
FJP
UTES
-
Consumer Defensive
FJP
UTES
-
Communication Services
FJP
UTES
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FJP vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank
FJP
UTES
FJP vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FJP | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.08 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 0.60 | +1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.55 | 1.32 | +5.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FJP vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FJP drawdown since its inception was -41.51%, which is greater than UTES's maximum drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJP and UTES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FJP | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.51% | -35.39% | -6.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.43% | -13.88% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.02% | -17.62% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.88% | -20.40% | -11.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.51% | -35.39% | -6.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.75% | -9.10% | +1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.45% | -5.53% | -5.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.89% | 6.29% | -1.40% |
Volatility
FJP vs. UTES - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) have volatilities of 7.16% and 7.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FJP | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.16% | 7.23% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.43% | 17.05% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.00% | 21.32% | -0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.43% | 20.62% | -0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.91% | 20.17% | -1.26% |
FJP vs. UTES - Expense Ratio Comparison
FJP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than UTES's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
FJP vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison
FJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than UTES's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJP First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund | 2.53% | 2.68% | 3.18% | 3.49% | 2.21% | 2.43% | 0.99% | 2.80% | 1.54% | 1.29% | 1.46% | 0.85% |
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 1.49% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 2.44% | 2.13% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.09% | 3.44% | 3.53% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FJP and UTES have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UTES has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to FJP (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJP dropped -41.51% vs UTES's -35.39%.
On 10-year performance, UTES leads with 12.27% vs 7.61% for FJP. On fees, UTES is cheaper at 0.49% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UTES has performed better with a 12.27% return vs 7.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UTES is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FJP.
FJP has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 1.49% for UTES.
FJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while UTES is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FJP and 0.49% for UTES.
FJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FJP and UTES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer