FJP vs. ALAI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FJP (First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund) and ALAI (Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Japan Index, while ALAI is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Alger. FJP is passively managed, while ALAI is actively managed. Over the past year, FJP returned 33.53% vs 63.92% for ALAI. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FJP charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ALAI.

Performance

FJP vs. ALAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP) and Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF (ALAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJP achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly lower than ALAI's 27.17% return.

FJP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.90%
• YTD: 14.28%
• 6M: 15.85%
• 1Y: 33.53%
• 3Y*: 21.60%
• 5Y*: 10.81%
• 10Y*: 7.48%

ALAI

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: 13.53%
• YTD: 27.17%
• 6M: 26.74%
• 1Y: 63.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJP vs. ALAI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FJP First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund	14.28%	33.60%	-2.99%
ALAI Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF	27.17%	39.81%	31.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FJP and ALAI is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2024	0.31

FJP vs. ALAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FJP	ALAI
Industrials	45.0%	3.2%
Consumer Cyclical	12.0%	13.7%
Basic Materials	9.7%	-
Technology	8.9%	55.9%
Utilities	6.1%	2.0%
Financial Services	5.6%	2.3%
Energy	4.2%	-
Healthcare	3.6%	2.8%
Real Estate	3.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	-
Communication Services	0.7%	20.1%

Return for Risk

FJP vs. ALAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJP

FJP Risk / Return Rank: 46
FJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
FJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FJP Omega Ratio Rank: 46
FJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
FJP Martin Ratio Rank: 44

ALAI

ALAI Risk / Return Rank: 70
ALAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
ALAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
ALAI Omega Ratio Rank: 70
ALAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
ALAI Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJP vs. ALAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP) and Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF (ALAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FJP	ALAI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	2.67	-1.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	3.27	-0.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.42	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	3.30	-0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.20	10.58	-3.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FJP vs. ALAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJP Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the ALAI Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJP and ALAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FJP	ALAI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.63	2.67	-1.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	1.71	-1.39

Drawdowns

FJP vs. ALAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJP drawdown since its inception was -41.51%, which is greater than ALAI's maximum drawdown of -29.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJP and ALAI.

Drawdown Indicators

	FJP	ALAI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.51%	-29.36%	-12.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.43%	-19.48%	+5.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.02%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.34%	-1.69%	-4.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.46%	-5.14%	-6.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.67%	6.06%	-1.39%

Volatility

FJP vs. ALAI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP) is 6.51%, while Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF (ALAI) has a volatility of 6.97%. This indicates that FJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FJP	ALAI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.51%	6.97%	-0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.87%	18.57%	-1.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.70%	24.06%	-3.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.35%	28.41%	-8.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.88%	28.41%	-9.53%

FJP vs. ALAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than ALAI's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

FJP vs. ALAI - Dividend Comparison

FJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than ALAI's 1.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ALAI Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF	1.18%	1.50%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FJP First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund	2.49%	2.68%	3.18%	3.49%	2.21%	2.43%	0.99%	2.80%	1.54%	1.29%	1.46%	0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FJP and ALAI in my portfolio?

FJP and ALAI have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FJP or ALAI?

ALAI has higher volatility (6.97%) compared to FJP (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJP dropped -41.51% vs ALAI's -29.36%.

Which ETF is better, FJP or ALAI?

On 1-year performance, ALAI leads with 63.92% vs 33.53% for FJP. On fees, ALAI is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, FJP has been the lower-risk option at 6.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FJP or ALAI?

Over the 1-year period, ALAI has performed better with a 63.92% return vs 33.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FJP or ALAI?

ALAI is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FJP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FJP or ALAI?

FJP has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.18% for ALAI.

What is the main difference between FJP and ALAI?

FJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while ALAI is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Alger. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FJP and 0.55% for ALAI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ALAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.