FJAN vs. BAPR
Compare and contrast key facts about FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (FJAN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR).
FJAN and BAPR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FJAN is a passively managed fund by FT Vest that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Jan 15, 2021. BAPR is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index April. It was launched on Mar 29, 2019. Both FJAN and BAPR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FJAN vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FJAN vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJAN FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January | -2.59% | 12.74% | 15.24% | 21.65% | -3.96% | 12.58% |
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April | 2.08% | 8.28% | 15.95% | 23.16% | -7.04% | 12.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FJAN achieves a -2.59% return, which is significantly lower than BAPR's 2.08% return.
FJAN
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- YTD
- -2.59%
- 6M
- 0.51%
- 1Y
- 13.66%
- 3Y*
- 13.07%
- 5Y*
- 9.83%
- 10Y*
- —
BAPR
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 2.08%
- 6M
- 4.42%
- 1Y
- 15.33%
- 3Y*
- 13.43%
- 5Y*
- 10.13%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FJAN vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FJAN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FJAN vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank
FJAN
BAPR
FJAN vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (FJAN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FJAN | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | 1.29 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 1.99 | -0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.40 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 1.74 | -0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.26 | 11.59 | -3.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FJAN | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 1.29 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.88 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.75 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between FJAN and BAPR is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FJAN vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison
Neither FJAN nor BAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FJAN vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FJAN drawdown since its inception was -13.58%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJAN and BAPR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FJAN | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.58% | -23.91% | +10.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.77% | -9.19% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.58% | -15.58% | +2.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.89% | 0.00% | -3.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.05% | -2.66% | +0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 1.38% | +0.30% |
Volatility
FJAN vs. BAPR - Volatility Comparison
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (FJAN) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) at 3.45%. This indicates that FJAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FJAN | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.86% | 3.45% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.89% | 4.26% | +1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.42% | 11.90% | +0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.48% | 11.54% | -1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.48% | 13.25% | -2.77% |