FJAN vs. SCHX
FJAN (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FJAN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500, while SCHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FJAN returned 11.19%/yr vs 13.29%/yr for SCHX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FJAN charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
FJAN vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FJAN achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 10.72% return.
FJAN
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 2.55%
- YTD
- 6.51%
- 6M
- 7.67%
- 1Y
- 18.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.10%
- 5Y*
- 11.19%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 27.36%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.41%
FJAN vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJAN FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January | 6.51% | 12.74% | 15.24% | 21.65% | -3.96% | 12.58% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 10.72% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 24.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between FJAN and SCHX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2021 | 0.94 |
The correlation between FJAN and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
FJAN vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FJAN
SCHX
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
FJAN
SCHX
Financial Services
FJAN
SCHX
Communication Services
FJAN
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
FJAN
SCHX
Healthcare
FJAN
SCHX
Industrials
FJAN
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
FJAN
SCHX
Energy
FJAN
SCHX
Utilities
FJAN
SCHX
Real Estate
FJAN
SCHX
Basic Materials
FJAN
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FJAN vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
FJAN
SCHX
FJAN vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (FJAN) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FJAN | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.41 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 3.05 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.85 | 13.85 | +3.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FJAN | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 2.29 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | 0.78 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.14 | 0.85 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
FJAN vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FJAN drawdown since its inception was -13.58%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJAN and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FJAN | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.58% | -34.33% | +20.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.91% | -9.02% | +3.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.92% | -19.04% | +6.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.58% | -25.41% | +11.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -0.70% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.00% | -3.97% | +1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.12% | 1.98% | -0.86% |
Volatility
FJAN vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (FJAN) is 1.36%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that FJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FJAN | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.36% | 2.91% | -1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.81% | 9.02% | -3.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.38% | 11.99% | -4.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.49% | 17.12% | -6.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.39% | 18.15% | -7.76% |
FJAN vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FJAN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FJAN vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
FJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJAN FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, FJAN and SCHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to FJAN (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJAN dropped -13.58% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 5-year performance, SCHX leads with 13.29% vs 11.19% for FJAN. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FJAN has been the lower-risk option at 1.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 13.29% return vs 11.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FJAN.
SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for FJAN.
FJAN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SCHX is Large Cap Blend Equities. FJAN tracks S&P 500, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FJAN and 0.03% for SCHX.
FJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FJAN and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer