PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJAN vs. SCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FJAN vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (FJAN) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJAN achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 10.72% return.


FJAN

1D
-0.28%
1M
2.55%
YTD
6.51%
6M
7.67%
1Y
18.90%
3Y*
15.10%
5Y*
11.19%
10Y*

SCHX

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.06%
YTD
10.72%
6M
10.60%
1Y
27.36%
3Y*
22.38%
5Y*
13.29%
10Y*
15.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJAN vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FJAN
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January
6.51%12.74%15.24%21.65%-3.96%12.58%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
10.72%17.46%24.88%26.84%-19.41%24.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FJAN and SCHX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2021

0.94

The correlation between FJAN and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FJAN vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FJAN
SCHX

Technology

36.2%
37.5%

Financial Services

11.9%
9.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.7%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.5%

Energy

3.5%
3.4%

Utilities

2.3%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

FJAN
36.2%
SCHX
37.5%

Financial Services

FJAN
11.9%
SCHX
9.9%

Communication Services

FJAN
10.9%
SCHX
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FJAN
10.1%
SCHX
9.7%

Healthcare

FJAN
8.4%
SCHX
8.4%

Industrials

FJAN
8.1%
SCHX
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

FJAN
4.9%
SCHX
4.5%

Energy

FJAN
3.5%
SCHX
3.4%

Utilities

FJAN
2.3%
SCHX
2.6%

Real Estate

FJAN
1.9%
SCHX
2.0%

Basic Materials

FJAN
1.8%
SCHX
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FJAN vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJAN
FJAN Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHX
SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJAN vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (FJAN) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FJANSCHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.57

2.29

+0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.70

3.14

+0.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.41

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

3.05

+0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.85

13.85

+3.00

FJAN vs. SCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the SCHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJAN and SCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FJANSCHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

2.29

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

0.78

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

0.85

+0.29

Drawdowns

FJAN vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJAN drawdown since its inception was -13.58%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJAN and SCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FJANSCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.58%

-34.33%

+20.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.91%

-9.02%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.92%

-19.04%

+6.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.58%

-25.41%

+11.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.70%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.00%

-3.97%

+1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

1.98%

-0.86%

Volatility

FJAN vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (FJAN) is 1.36%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that FJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FJANSCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

2.91%

-1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.81%

9.02%

-3.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.38%

11.99%

-4.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.49%

17.12%

-6.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.39%

18.15%

-7.76%

FJAN vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJAN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FJAN vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison

FJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FJAN
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
1.01%1.09%1.22%1.39%1.64%1.22%1.64%1.82%2.02%1.70%1.92%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FJAN and SCHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to FJAN (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJAN dropped -13.58% vs SCHX's -34.33%.

On 5-year performance, SCHX leads with 13.29% vs 11.19% for FJAN. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FJAN has been the lower-risk option at 1.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 13.29% return vs 11.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FJAN.

SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for FJAN.

FJAN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SCHX is Large Cap Blend Equities. FJAN tracks S&P 500, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FJAN and 0.03% for SCHX.

FJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FJAN and SCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer