FJAMX vs. FRQAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FJAMX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class A) and FRQAX (Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FJAMX returned 6.54%/yr vs 2.64%/yr for FRQAX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.71% expense ratio.

Performance

FJAMX vs. FRQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class A (FJAMX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJAMX achieves a 8.94% return, which is significantly higher than FRQAX's 3.95% return.

FJAMX

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 3.54%
• YTD: 8.94%
• 6M: 9.66%
• 1Y: 20.86%
• 3Y*: 14.63%
• 5Y*: 6.54%
• 10Y*: —

FRQAX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 1.52%
• YTD: 3.95%
• 6M: 4.14%
• 1Y: 10.15%
• 3Y*: 7.39%
• 5Y*: 2.64%
• 10Y*: 4.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJAMX vs. FRQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FJAMX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class A	8.94%	16.59%	10.70%	14.99%	-17.85%	10.92%	14.85%	22.28%	-9.49%
FRQAX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A	3.95%	9.54%	4.21%	8.24%	-12.60%	3.56%	9.32%	12.33%	-3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FJAMX and FRQAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018	0.89

The correlation between FJAMX and FRQAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FJAMX vs. FRQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJAMX

FJAMX Risk / Return Rank: 67
FJAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FJAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FJAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FJAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FJAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

FRQAX

FRQAX Risk / Return Rank: 69
FRQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FRQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FRQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FRQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FRQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJAMX vs. FRQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class A (FJAMX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FJAMX	FRQAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	2.46	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.44	3.61	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.49	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.07	2.95	+0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.31	12.54	+0.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FJAMX vs. FRQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJAMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the FRQAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJAMX and FRQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FJAMX	FRQAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41	2.46	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.48	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.51	+0.19

Drawdowns

FJAMX vs. FRQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJAMX drawdown since its inception was -24.84%, smaller than the maximum FRQAX drawdown of -38.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJAMX and FRQAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FJAMX	FRQAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.84%	-38.22%	+13.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.86%	-3.46%	-3.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.16%	-5.27%	-4.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.84%	-17.24%	-7.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-17.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.40%	-4.57%	-0.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.58%	0.81%	+0.77%

Volatility

FJAMX vs. FRQAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class A (FJAMX) has a higher volatility of 3.09% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX) at 1.67%. This indicates that FJAMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FJAMX	FRQAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.09%	1.67%	+1.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.18%	3.43%	+3.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.72%	4.15%	+4.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.85%	5.56%	+5.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.30%	5.33%	+6.97%

FJAMX vs. FRQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FJAMX and FRQAX have an expense ratio of 0.71%.

Dividends

FJAMX vs. FRQAX - Dividend Comparison

FJAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than FRQAX's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FJAMX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class A	3.34%	2.71%	3.79%	2.11%	5.13%	6.90%	4.47%	3.18%	2.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FRQAX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A	2.82%	2.72%	2.71%	2.46%	4.74%	5.76%	3.26%	2.93%	5.33%	16.05%	2.18%	3.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FJAMX and FRQAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FJAMX and FRQAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FJAMX or FRQAX?

FJAMX has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to FRQAX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJAMX dropped -24.84% vs FRQAX's -38.22%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.