FJALX vs. FRQAX
FJALX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2020 Fund Class C) and FRQAX (Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FJALX returned 3.77%/yr vs 2.49%/yr for FRQAX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FJALX charges 1.44%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for FRQAX.
Performance
FJALX vs. FRQAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FJALX achieves a 6.67% return, which is significantly higher than FRQAX's 3.51% return.
FJALX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 6.67%
- 6M
- 6.42%
- 1Y
- 14.83%
- 3Y*
- 10.39%
- 5Y*
- 3.77%
- 10Y*
- —
FRQAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 3.48%
- 1Y
- 8.84%
- 3Y*
- 7.14%
- 5Y*
- 2.49%
- 10Y*
- 4.86%
FJALX vs. FRQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJALX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2020 Fund Class C | 6.67% | 13.16% | 5.93% | 11.60% | -17.40% | 7.51% | 12.12% | 17.20% | -7.70% |
FRQAX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A | 3.51% | 9.54% | 4.21% | 8.24% | -12.60% | 3.56% | 9.32% | 12.33% | -3.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between FJALX and FRQAX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018 | 0.93 |
The correlation between FJALX and FRQAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FJALX vs. FRQAX — Risk / Return Rank
FJALX
FRQAX
FJALX vs. FRQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2020 Fund Class C (FJALX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FJALX | FRQAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.43 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 2.66 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.64 | 11.08 | +0.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FJALX vs. FRQAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FJALX drawdown since its inception was -23.54%, smaller than the maximum FRQAX drawdown of -38.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJALX and FRQAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FJALX | FRQAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.54% | -38.22% | +14.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.60% | -3.46% | -2.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.04% | -5.27% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.54% | -17.24% | -6.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -0.43% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.42% | -4.56% | -0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.32% | 0.83% | +0.49% |
Volatility
FJALX vs. FRQAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2020 Fund Class C (FJALX) has a higher volatility of 3.07% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX) at 1.67%. This indicates that FJALX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FJALX | FRQAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 1.67% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.36% | 3.68% | +2.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.49% | 4.36% | +3.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.03% | 5.59% | +3.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.73% | 5.34% | +4.39% |
FJALX vs. FRQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FJALX has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQAX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
FJALX vs. FRQAX - Dividend Comparison
FJALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than FRQAX's 2.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJALX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2020 Fund Class C | 2.55% | 1.76% | 1.54% | 1.59% | 5.06% | 6.50% | 3.66% | 2.18% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FRQAX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A | 2.99% | 2.72% | 2.71% | 2.46% | 4.74% | 5.76% | 3.26% | 2.93% | 5.33% | 16.05% | 2.18% | 3.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FJALX and FRQAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FJALX has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to FRQAX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJALX dropped -23.54% vs FRQAX's -38.22%.
FRQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FJALX and FRQAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer