PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJADX vs. LTFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FJADX vs. LTFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class I (FJADX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJADX achieves a 6.57% return, which is significantly lower than LTFIX's 8.75% return.


FJADX

1D
1.25%
1M
-1.07%
6M
4.28%
YTD
6.57%
1Y
14.17%
3Y*
11.18%
5Y*
5.05%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.28%

LTFIX

1D
1.71%
1M
0.48%
6M
5.91%
YTD
8.75%
1Y
18.10%
3Y*
16.06%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
11.24%
ALL TIME*
8.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FJADX vs. LTFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FJADX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class I
6.57%15.85%7.94%13.92%-17.18%9.72%14.17%19.99%-7.73%
LTFIX
Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund
8.75%17.80%17.28%20.33%-18.84%17.73%16.47%27.27%-13.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FJADX and LTFIX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018

0.93

The correlation between FJADX and LTFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FJADX vs. LTFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FJADX
FJADX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FJADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJADX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FJADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJADX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

LTFIX
LTFIX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
LTFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
LTFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FJADX vs. LTFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class I (FJADX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FJADXLTFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.23

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

1.84

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.78

7.90

+0.88

FJADX vs. LTFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJADX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the LTFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJADX and LTFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FJADX vs. LTFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJADX drawdown since its inception was -23.99%, smaller than the maximum LTFIX drawdown of -52.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJADX and LTFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FJADXLTFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.99%

-52.73%

+28.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.28%

-8.71%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.00%

-15.70%

+6.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.99%

-26.80%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.81%

-0.83%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.02%

-7.58%

+2.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

2.03%

-0.49%

Volatility

FJADX vs. LTFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class I (FJADX) is 2.62%, while Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that FJADX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FJADXLTFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

3.49%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.68%

10.64%

-2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.94%

12.88%

-3.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.12%

15.60%

-5.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.92%

15.80%

-4.88%

FJADX vs. LTFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJADX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LTFIX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FJADX vs. LTFIX - Dividend Comparison

FJADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, less than LTFIX's 8.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FJADX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class I
3.24%2.41%2.20%2.22%5.48%6.75%4.28%3.20%2.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LTFIX
Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund
8.02%8.73%8.47%4.17%8.60%5.83%3.91%6.03%6.60%3.51%3.99%4.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FJADX and LTFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LTFIX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to FJADX (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJADX dropped -23.99% vs LTFIX's -52.73%.

FJADX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FJADX and LTFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer