PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJADX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FJADX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class I (FJADX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FJADX having a 7.71% return and FCNTX slightly higher at 8.01%.


FJADX

1D
0.15%
1M
2.40%
YTD
7.71%
6M
8.75%
1Y
19.04%
3Y*
12.84%
5Y*
5.47%
10Y*

FCNTX

1D
-0.08%
1M
3.72%
YTD
8.01%
6M
10.12%
1Y
24.23%
3Y*
27.03%
5Y*
15.03%
10Y*
17.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJADX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FJADX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class I
7.71%15.85%7.94%13.92%-17.18%9.72%14.17%19.99%-7.73%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
8.01%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-16.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FJADX and FCNTX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.82

The correlation between FJADX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FJADX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJADX
FJADX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FJADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJADX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FJADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJADX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJADX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class I (FJADX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FJADXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.42

1.83

+0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.48

2.54

+0.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.33

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

2.26

+0.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.33

9.62

+3.71

FJADX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJADX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJADX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FJADXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

1.83

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.79

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.78

-0.07

Drawdowns

FJADX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJADX drawdown since its inception was -23.99%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJADX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FJADXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.99%

-49.19%

+25.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.28%

-11.30%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.00%

-19.75%

+10.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.99%

-32.59%

+8.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.30%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.11%

-8.16%

+3.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

2.65%

-1.21%

Volatility

FJADX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class I (FJADX) is 2.89%, while Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 3.24%. This indicates that FJADX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FJADXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

3.24%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.61%

10.48%

-3.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.01%

14.06%

-6.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.97%

19.15%

-9.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.92%

19.68%

-8.76%

FJADX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJADX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FJADX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FJADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than FCNTX's 4.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.32%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FJADX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class I
3.20%2.41%2.20%2.22%5.48%6.75%4.28%3.20%2.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FJADX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCNTX has higher volatility (3.24%) compared to FJADX (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJADX dropped -23.99% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FJADX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FJADX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer