PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJABX vs. FFSZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FJABX vs. FFSZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class Z (FJABX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJABX achieves a 7.80% return, which is significantly lower than FFSZX's 13.95% return.


FJABX

1D
0.15%
1M
2.41%
YTD
7.80%
6M
8.86%
1Y
19.13%
3Y*
12.93%
5Y*
5.60%
10Y*

FFSZX

1D
0.58%
1M
5.16%
YTD
13.95%
6M
15.89%
1Y
31.60%
3Y*
21.06%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJABX vs. FFSZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FJABX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class Z
7.80%15.96%7.96%14.21%-17.09%9.91%14.26%6.77%
FFSZX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6
13.95%24.08%14.41%20.78%-18.05%16.81%18.36%9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FJABX and FFSZX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019

0.96

The correlation between FJABX and FFSZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FJABX vs. FFSZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJABX
FJABX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FJABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJABX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FJABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJABX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FFSZX
FFSZX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FFSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FFSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJABX vs. FFSZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class Z (FJABX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FJABXFFSZXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.42

2.52

-0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.47

3.46

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.47

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

3.29

-0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.36

14.70

-1.33

FJABX vs. FFSZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJABX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the FFSZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJABX and FFSZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FJABXFFSZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.52

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.72

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.80

-0.09

Drawdowns

FJABX vs. FFSZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJABX drawdown since its inception was -23.76%, smaller than the maximum FFSZX drawdown of -31.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJABX and FFSZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FJABXFFSZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.76%

-31.00%

+7.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.35%

-9.77%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.90%

-15.36%

+6.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.76%

-27.17%

+3.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.04%

-5.81%

+0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

2.18%

-0.72%

Volatility

FJABX vs. FFSZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class Z (FJABX) is 2.92%, while Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that FJABX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFSZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FJABXFFSZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

4.27%

-1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.66%

10.55%

-3.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.06%

12.76%

-4.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.97%

15.02%

-5.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.90%

17.05%

-6.15%

FJABX vs. FFSZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJABX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FFSZX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FJABX vs. FFSZX - Dividend Comparison

FJABX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than FFSZX's 5.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FFSZX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6
5.03%3.82%2.92%2.26%8.99%7.98%2.41%1.47%0.00%
FJABX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class Z
3.31%2.53%2.33%2.41%5.73%6.94%4.30%3.03%2.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FJABX and FFSZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFSZX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to FJABX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJABX dropped -23.76% vs FFSZX's -31.00%.

FFSZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FJABX and FFSZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer