FIYY vs. QUSA
FIYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF) and QUSA (VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FIYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for QUSA.
Performance
FIYY vs. QUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FIYY
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUSA
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- YTD
- 9.61%
- 1Y
- 5.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIYY vs. QUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FIYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF | -1.79% |
QUSA VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF | 4.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIYY and QUSA is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIYY vs. QUSA — Risk / Return Rank
FIYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QUSA
FIYY vs. QUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF (FIYY) and VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF (QUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIYY | QUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.09 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.50 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.19 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIYY vs. QUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIYY drawdown since its inception was -2.51%, smaller than the maximum QUSA drawdown of -10.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIYY and QUSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIYY | QUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.51% | -10.64% | +8.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.91% | -1.81% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -3.60% | +2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.25% | — |
Volatility
FIYY vs. QUSA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIYY | QUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.95% | 10.90% | -5.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.95% | 10.70% | -5.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.95% | 10.70% | -5.75% |
FIYY vs. QUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than QUSA's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIYY vs. QUSA - Dividend Comparison
FIYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than QUSA's 13.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FIYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF | 1.13% | 0.00% |
QUSA VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF | 13.91% | 6.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIYY and QUSA have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QUSA is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QUSA is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for FIYY.
QUSA has the higher dividend yield at 13.91%, compared with 1.13% for FIYY.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for FIYY and 0.95% for QUSA.
Find the right allocation for FIYY and QUSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer