FIXT vs. IMFL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FIXT (Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF) and IMFL (Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF) are both Global Equities funds - FIXT tracks the VettaFi Natural Disaster Response and Mitigation Index while IMFL tracks the FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FIXT returned 4.69% vs 29.53% for IMFL. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FIXT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for IMFL.

Performance

FIXT vs. IMFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) and Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIXT achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than IMFL's 14.49% return.

FIXT

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 1.07%
• YTD: 0.71%
• 6M: 0.66%
• 1Y: 4.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IMFL

• 1D: -2.84%
• 1M: -0.86%
• YTD: 14.49%
• 6M: 14.56%
• 1Y: 29.53%
• 3Y*: 16.29%
• 5Y*: 8.35%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIXT vs. IMFL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	0.71%	4.57%
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF	14.49%	12.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FIXT and IMFL is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025	0.36

FIXT vs. IMFL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FIXT	IMFL
Healthcare	100.0%	11.8%
Basic Materials	-	5.3%
Communication Services	-	3.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	7.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	11.3%
Energy	-	5.3%
Financial Services	-	10.9%
Industrials	-	17.2%
Real Estate	-	1.4%
Technology	-	17.6%
Utilities	-	3.7%

Return for Risk

FIXT vs. IMFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIXT

FIXT Risk / Return Rank: 36
FIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
FIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 36
FIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 32

IMFL

IMFL Risk / Return Rank: 55
IMFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
IMFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
IMFL Omega Ratio Rank: 54
IMFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
IMFL Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIXT vs. IMFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) and Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIXT	IMFL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	1.77	-0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	2.42	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.32	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	2.52	-0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.33	8.82	-4.49

FIXT vs. IMFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIXT Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the IMFL Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIXT and IMFL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIXT vs. IMFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIXT drawdown since its inception was -3.02%, smaller than the maximum IMFL drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIXT and IMFL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIXT	IMFL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.02%	-33.26%	+30.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.02%	-11.77%	+8.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.52%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.42%	-3.35%	+1.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.75%	-7.19%	+6.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.08%	3.36%	-2.28%

Volatility

FIXT vs. IMFL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) is 0.91%, while Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) has a volatility of 6.64%. This indicates that FIXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIXT	IMFL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.91%	6.64%	-5.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.48%	14.32%	-11.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.77%	16.75%	-12.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.74%	16.24%	-12.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.74%	16.13%	-12.39%

FIXT vs. IMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIXT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IMFL's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIXT vs. IMFL - Dividend Comparison

FIXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, more than IMFL's 2.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	5.52%	3.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF	2.96%	2.88%	3.56%	3.85%	3.35%	3.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIXT and IMFL in my portfolio?

FIXT and IMFL have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIXT or IMFL?

IMFL has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to FIXT (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIXT dropped -3.02% vs IMFL's -33.26%.

Which ETF is better, FIXT or IMFL?

On 1-year performance, IMFL leads with 29.53% vs 4.69% for FIXT. On fees, IMFL is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, FIXT has been the lower-risk option at 0.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FIXT or IMFL?

Over the 1-year period, IMFL has performed better with a 29.53% return vs 4.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FIXT or IMFL?

IMFL is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FIXT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FIXT or IMFL?

FIXT has the higher dividend yield at 5.52%, compared with 2.96% for IMFL.

What is the main difference between FIXT and IMFL?

FIXT tracks VettaFi Natural Disaster Response and Mitigation Index, while IMFL tracks FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. They also come from different issuers: Procure and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FIXT and 0.34% for IMFL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IMFL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.