FIXT vs. IMFL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FIXT (Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF) and IMFL (Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF) are both Global Equities funds - FIXT tracks the VettaFi Natural Disaster Response and Mitigation Index while IMFL tracks the FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FIXT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for IMFL.

Performance

FIXT vs. IMFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) and Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIXT achieves a 0.23% return, which is significantly lower than IMFL's 17.58% return.

FIXT

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 0.23%
• 6M: 0.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IMFL

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 5.50%
• YTD: 17.58%
• 6M: 20.95%
• 1Y: 33.05%
• 3Y*: 17.51%
• 5Y*: 8.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIXT vs. IMFL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	0.23%	4.58%
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF	17.58%	12.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FIXT and IMFL is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025	0.38

FIXT vs. IMFL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FIXT	IMFL
Healthcare	100.0%	12.8%
Basic Materials	-	5.5%
Communication Services	-	3.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	7.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	11.6%
Energy	-	5.9%
Financial Services	-	11.0%
Industrials	-	17.4%
Real Estate	-	1.5%
Technology	-	15.4%
Utilities	-	3.9%

Return for Risk

FIXT vs. IMFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMFL

IMFL Risk / Return Rank: 60
IMFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
IMFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
IMFL Omega Ratio Rank: 61
IMFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
IMFL Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIXT vs. IMFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) and Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIXT	IMFL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.34	0.62	+0.71

Drawdowns

FIXT vs. IMFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIXT drawdown since its inception was -3.02%, smaller than the maximum IMFL drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIXT and IMFL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIXT	IMFL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.02%	-33.26%	+30.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.77%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.52%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.88%	-0.54%	-1.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.71%	-7.24%	+6.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.32%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FIXT	IMFL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.74%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.08%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.77%	15.71%	-11.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.77%	16.05%	-12.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.77%	15.99%	-12.22%

FIXT vs. IMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIXT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IMFL's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIXT vs. IMFL - Dividend Comparison

FIXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.55%, more than IMFL's 2.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	5.55%	3.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF	2.87%	2.88%	3.56%	3.85%	3.35%	3.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIXT and IMFL in my portfolio?

FIXT and IMFL have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FIXT or IMFL?

On fees, IMFL is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FIXT or IMFL?

IMFL is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FIXT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FIXT or IMFL?

FIXT has the higher dividend yield at 5.55%, compared with 2.87% for IMFL.

What is the main difference between FIXT and IMFL?

FIXT tracks VettaFi Natural Disaster Response and Mitigation Index, while IMFL tracks FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. They also come from different issuers: Procure and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FIXT and 0.34% for IMFL.