PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIX vs. HWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FIX vs. HWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIX achieves a 101.37% return, which is significantly higher than HWM's 29.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FIX has outperformed HWM with an annualized return of 51.27%, while HWM has yielded a comparatively lower 33.28% annualized return.


FIX

1D
1.85%
1M
-5.78%
YTD
101.37%
6M
94.15%
1Y
281.93%
3Y*
128.82%
5Y*
86.97%
10Y*
51.27%

HWM

1D
0.03%
1M
-2.83%
YTD
29.23%
6M
33.60%
1Y
54.95%
3Y*
79.69%
5Y*
50.00%
10Y*
33.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIX vs. HWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIX
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
101.37%120.86%106.89%79.62%16.98%88.98%6.73%15.07%0.73%32.13%
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
29.23%87.95%102.71%37.84%24.16%11.67%21.03%83.54%-37.43%48.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FIX and HWM is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 1997

0.35

Over the past year, FIX and HWM have become more correlated (0.58) than their long-term average of 0.35, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FIX:

$66.19B

HWM:

$106.66B

EPS

FIX:

$34.64

HWM:

$4.31

PE Ratio

FIX:

54.21

HWM:

61.42

PEG Ratio

FIX:

0.82

HWM:

1.04

PS Ratio

FIX:

6.54

HWM:

12.42

PB Ratio

FIX:

23.51

HWM:

19.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

FIX:

$10.14B

HWM:

$8.62B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FIX:

$2.55B

HWM:

$2.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

FIX:

$1.70B

HWM:

$2.66B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIX vs. HWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIX
FIX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

HWM
HWM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
HWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIX vs. HWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIXHWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.30

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

17.58

3.46

+14.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

59.47

9.77

+49.70

FIX vs. HWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIX Sharpe Ratio is 5.13, which is higher than the HWM Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIX and HWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIX vs. HWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIX drawdown since its inception was -93.36%, which is greater than HWM's maximum drawdown of -88.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIX and HWM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIXHWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.36%

-88.30%

-5.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.78%

-15.89%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.05%

-19.41%

-26.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.05%

-21.61%

-24.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.68%

-64.81%

+15.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.03%

-3.26%

-4.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.06%

-31.00%

-7.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.66%

5.61%

-0.95%

Volatility

FIX vs. HWM - Volatility Comparison

Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) has a higher volatility of 15.34% compared to Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) at 11.03%. This indicates that FIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIXHWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.34%

11.03%

+4.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.30%

25.03%

+13.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.05%

31.46%

+22.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.66%

32.20%

+12.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.44%

39.82%

+2.62%

Dividends

FIX vs. HWM - Dividend Comparison

FIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than HWM's 0.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIX
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
0.14%0.21%0.28%0.41%0.49%0.49%0.81%0.79%0.76%0.68%0.83%0.88%
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
0.18%0.21%0.24%0.31%0.25%0.13%0.05%0.39%1.42%0.88%40.49%1.22%

Financials

FIX vs. HWM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Comfort Systems USA, Inc. and Howmet Aerospace Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
2.87B
2.31B
(FIX) Total Revenue
(HWM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FIX vs. HWM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Comfort Systems USA, Inc. and Howmet Aerospace Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%20222023202420252026
26.3%
36.9%
Portfolio components
FIX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a gross profit of 754.41M and revenue of 2.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.3%.

HWM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a gross profit of 854.00M and revenue of 2.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.

FIX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported an operating income of 485.72M and revenue of 2.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.0%.

HWM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported an operating income of 734.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.

FIX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a net income of 370.38M and revenue of 2.87B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.

HWM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a net income of 580.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in a net margin of 25.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FIX and HWM have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIX has higher volatility (15.34%) compared to HWM (11.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIX dropped -93.36% vs HWM's -88.30%.

FIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.13 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIX and HWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer