PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIX vs. HUT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FIX vs. HUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) and Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock (HUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIX achieves a 98.62% return, which is significantly lower than HUT's 160.34% return.


FIX

1D
0.44%
1M
-5.10%
YTD
98.62%
6M
87.34%
1Y
263.59%
3Y*
127.92%
5Y*
85.83%
10Y*
50.73%

HUT

1D
6.56%
1M
21.47%
YTD
160.34%
6M
178.59%
1Y
544.05%
3Y*
132.23%
5Y*
42.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIX vs. HUT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIX
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
98.62%120.86%106.89%79.62%16.98%88.98%6.73%15.07%5.44%
HUT
Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock
160.34%124.21%53.60%213.88%-89.17%185.45%250.63%-25.02%-70.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FIX and HUT is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2018

0.28

The correlation between FIX and HUT shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FIX:

$65.29B

HUT:

$13.28B

EPS

FIX:

$34.64

HUT:

-$2.73

PB Ratio

FIX:

23.19

HUT:

9.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

FIX:

$10.14B

HUT:

-$40.96M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FIX:

$2.55B

HUT:

-$132.19M

EBITDA (TTM)

FIX:

$1.70B

HUT:

-$306.16M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIX vs. HUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIX
FIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

HUT
HUT Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
HUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIX vs. HUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) and Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock (HUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIXHUTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.49

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

19.28

14.21

+5.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

59.72

39.02

+20.70

FIX vs. HUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIX Sharpe Ratio is 4.98, which is comparable to the HUT Sharpe Ratio of 5.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIX and HUT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIXHUTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.98

5.36

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.94

0.40

+1.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.23

+0.17

Drawdowns

FIX vs. HUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIX drawdown since its inception was -93.36%, roughly equal to the maximum HUT drawdown of -95.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIX and HUT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIXHUTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.36%

-95.04%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.77%

-38.62%

+24.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.05%

-71.68%

+25.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.05%

-95.04%

+48.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.28%

-10.09%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.08%

-63.67%

+25.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.46%

14.04%

-9.58%

Volatility

FIX vs. HUT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) is 12.60%, while Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock (HUT) has a volatility of 24.05%. This indicates that FIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIXHUTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.60%

24.05%

-11.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.27%

75.69%

-38.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.46%

102.62%

-49.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.49%

106.40%

-61.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.35%

114.79%

-72.44%

Dividends

FIX vs. HUT - Dividend Comparison

FIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while HUT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIX
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
0.14%0.21%0.28%0.41%0.49%0.49%0.81%0.79%0.76%0.68%0.83%0.88%
HUT
Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FIX vs. HUT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Comfort Systems USA, Inc. and Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-500.00M0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
2.87B
71.02M
(FIX) Total Revenue
(HUT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FIX and HUT have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HUT has higher volatility (24.05%) compared to FIX (12.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIX dropped -93.36% vs HUT's -95.04%.

HUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.36 vs 4.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIX and HUT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer