PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIWFX vs. PDDDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIWFX vs. PDDDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FIWFX) and Prudential Day One 2020 Fund (PDDDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FIWFX having a 4.21% return and PDDDX slightly higher at 4.42%.


FIWFX

1D
-0.63%
1M
0.19%
YTD
4.21%
6M
3.90%
1Y
10.75%
3Y*
9.35%
5Y*
3.95%
10Y*
6.51%

PDDDX

1D
-0.46%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
4.42%
6M
3.92%
1Y
10.22%
3Y*
11.99%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIWFX vs. PDDDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIWFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class
4.21%11.81%6.76%11.32%-14.44%6.84%11.61%16.47%-3.39%12.67%
PDDDX
Prudential Day One 2020 Fund
4.42%10.40%15.97%9.52%-12.63%36.80%8.13%14.99%-4.65%10.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FIWFX and PDDDX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.93

The correlation between FIWFX and PDDDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIWFX vs. PDDDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIWFX
FIWFX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FIWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FIWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

PDDDX
PDDDX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PDDDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDDDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDDDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PDDDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDDDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIWFX vs. PDDDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FIWFX) and Prudential Day One 2020 Fund (PDDDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIWFXPDDDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.38

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

2.69

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.47

12.20

-0.73

FIWFX vs. PDDDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIWFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the PDDDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIWFX and PDDDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIWFX vs. PDDDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIWFX drawdown since its inception was -19.50%, roughly equal to the maximum PDDDX drawdown of -18.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIWFX and PDDDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIWFXPDDDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.50%

-18.88%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.31%

-3.90%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.72%

-6.09%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.50%

-16.64%

-2.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-1.27%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-2.99%

-0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

0.86%

+0.14%

Volatility

FIWFX vs. PDDDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FIWFX) has a higher volatility of 2.43% compared to Prudential Day One 2020 Fund (PDDDX) at 2.05%. This indicates that FIWFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDDDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIWFXPDDDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

2.05%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.79%

4.28%

+0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.68%

5.22%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.35%

13.77%

-6.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.49%

11.35%

-3.86%

FIWFX vs. PDDDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIWFX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PDDDX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIWFX vs. PDDDX - Dividend Comparison

FIWFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than PDDDX's 3.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIWFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class
4.92%5.46%5.21%2.60%3.14%2.90%2.67%18.25%3.19%1.99%1.91%1.77%
PDDDX
Prudential Day One 2020 Fund
3.88%4.05%19.73%3.22%8.41%28.05%1.91%3.76%3.05%0.86%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FIWFX and PDDDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIWFX has higher volatility (2.43%) compared to PDDDX (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIWFX dropped -19.50% vs PDDDX's -18.88%.

FIWFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIWFX and PDDDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer