PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIVMX vs. FACNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIVMX vs. FACNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class A (FIVMX) and Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A (FACNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIVMX achieves a 7.44% return, which is significantly higher than FACNX's 4.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FIVMX having a 9.93% annualized return and FACNX not far ahead at 10.10%.


FIVMX

1D
0.20%
1M
0.86%
YTD
7.44%
6M
7.13%
1Y
24.73%
3Y*
21.24%
5Y*
12.70%
10Y*
9.93%

FACNX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
4.37%
6M
3.40%
1Y
14.15%
3Y*
15.87%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
10.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIVMX vs. FACNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIVMX
Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class A
7.44%43.16%4.57%18.83%-8.19%14.59%2.96%18.46%-17.44%17.95%
FACNX
Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A
4.37%25.49%8.83%14.33%-6.44%26.44%4.11%25.42%-14.59%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FIVMX and FACNX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007

0.77

The correlation between FIVMX and FACNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIVMX vs. FACNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIVMX
FIVMX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FIVMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIVMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIVMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FIVMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIVMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

FACNX
FACNX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FACNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FACNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FACNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FACNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FACNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIVMX vs. FACNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class A (FIVMX) and Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A (FACNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIVMXFACNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.20

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

1.91

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.83

6.15

+2.68

FIVMX vs. FACNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the FACNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVMX and FACNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIVMX vs. FACNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVMX drawdown since its inception was -64.61%, which is greater than FACNX's maximum drawdown of -58.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVMX and FACNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIVMXFACNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.61%

-58.18%

-6.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-7.63%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.55%

-12.16%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.56%

-21.12%

-6.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.79%

-39.88%

-3.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-3.80%

+2.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.98%

-12.14%

-4.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

2.36%

+0.49%

Volatility

FIVMX vs. FACNX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class A (FIVMX) and Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A (FACNX) have volatilities of 4.09% and 3.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIVMXFACNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

3.98%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.20%

10.23%

+1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.89%

12.97%

+1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.55%

16.00%

+0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.88%

17.44%

+0.44%

FIVMX vs. FACNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIVMX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FACNX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIVMX vs. FACNX - Dividend Comparison

FIVMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than FACNX's 5.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FACNX
Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class A
5.18%5.41%7.14%3.06%3.79%4.86%2.28%4.13%6.91%0.89%1.31%0.15%
FIVMX
Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class A
2.02%2.17%1.95%1.81%1.63%4.10%1.47%3.18%2.92%0.15%2.30%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIVMX and FACNX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIVMX has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to FACNX (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVMX dropped -64.61% vs FACNX's -58.18%.

FIVMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIVMX and FACNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer