PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIVLX vs. FLCCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIVLX vs. FLCCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Value Fund (FIVLX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C (FLCCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, FIVLX has underperformed FLCCX with an annualized return of 9.41%, while FLCCX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.12% annualized return.


FIVLX

1D
0.33%
1M
2.86%
YTD
7.08%
6M
11.18%
1Y
23.52%
3Y*
21.69%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
9.41%

FLCCX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
11.54%
3Y*
18.09%
5Y*
11.36%
10Y*
13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIVLX vs. FLCCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIVLX
Fidelity International Value Fund
7.08%43.67%5.33%19.27%-7.99%14.89%3.36%18.92%-17.17%17.85%
FLCCX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C
0.00%18.58%25.08%22.21%-8.85%24.54%7.70%30.36%-9.25%16.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FIVLX and FLCCX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2006

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between FIVLX and FLCCX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIVLX vs. FLCCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIVLX
FIVLX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
FIVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FIVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCCX
FLCCX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FLCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIVLX vs. FLCCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Fund (FIVLX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C (FLCCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIVLXFLCCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.46

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

2.73

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.03

4.65

+3.38

FIVLX vs. FLCCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the FLCCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVLX and FLCCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIVLXFLCCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

1.73

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.71

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.72

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.43

-0.20

Drawdowns

FIVLX vs. FLCCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVLX drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, roughly equal to the maximum FLCCX drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVLX and FLCCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIVLXFLCCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.21%

-65.81%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.44%

-5.10%

-5.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.48%

-19.06%

+4.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.49%

-22.04%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.43%

-37.63%

-5.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-4.23%

+2.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.07%

-15.48%

-1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

2.82%

0.00%

Volatility

FIVLX vs. FLCCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Value Fund (FIVLX) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C (FLCCX) at 0.00%. This indicates that FIVLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIVLXFLCCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

0.00%

+4.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.82%

4.21%

+7.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.65%

8.06%

+6.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.55%

16.44%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.92%

18.59%

-0.67%

FIVLX vs. FLCCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIVLX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FLCCX's 1.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIVLX vs. FLCCX - Dividend Comparison

FIVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than FLCCX's 6.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIVLX
Fidelity International Value Fund
2.17%2.32%2.90%2.06%1.85%4.35%1.74%3.54%3.33%0.15%2.71%1.44%
FLCCX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C
6.79%6.79%6.81%3.27%1.77%6.87%5.44%8.90%18.35%7.06%1.65%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIVLX and FLCCX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIVLX has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to FLCCX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVLX dropped -65.21% vs FLCCX's -65.81%.

FLCCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIVLX and FLCCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer