FIVFX vs. MSMLX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FIVFX (Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund) and MSMLX (Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund) are both mutual funds - FIVFX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while MSMLX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Matthews. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIVFX charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.37%/yr for MSMLX.

Performance

FIVFX vs. MSMLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund (FIVFX) and Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (MSMLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FIVFX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSMLX

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 2.24%
• YTD: 25.47%
• 6M: 24.22%
• 1Y: 34.43%
• 3Y*: 13.33%
• 5Y*: 8.65%
• 10Y*: 11.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIVFX vs. MSMLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIVFX Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund	0.00%	19.54%	8.05%	27.58%	-26.48%	12.14%	22.32%	33.05%	-12.87%	35.81%
MSMLX Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund	25.47%	13.50%	-6.10%	20.04%	-16.78%	26.40%	43.69%	17.38%	-17.80%	30.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FIVFX and MSMLX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2008	0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between FIVFX and MSMLX has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FIVFX vs. MSMLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSMLX

MSMLX Risk / Return Rank: 46
MSMLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
MSMLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
MSMLX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
MSMLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
MSMLX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIVFX vs. MSMLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund (FIVFX) and Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (MSMLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIVFX	MSMLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.96	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.65	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FIVFX	MSMLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-36.40%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.89%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.62%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.00%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.49%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-9.24%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.86%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FIVFX	MSMLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.17%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.84%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	18.81%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	17.74%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	17.18%	—

FIVFX vs. MSMLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIVFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MSMLX's 1.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIVFX vs. MSMLX - Dividend Comparison

FIVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.67%, more than MSMLX's 1.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIVFX Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund	10.67%	10.67%	4.19%	0.38%	0.05%	9.08%	1.28%	3.29%	3.00%	2.99%	0.68%	1.57%
MSMLX Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund	1.19%	1.50%	3.95%	8.36%	8.04%	9.18%	0.28%	0.51%	21.31%	8.12%	0.43%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIVFX and MSMLX in my portfolio?

FIVFX and MSMLX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.