FITWX vs. URFFX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FITWX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class I) and URFFX (USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, FITWX returned 7.67%/yr vs 10.12%/yr for URFFX. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. FITWX charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for URFFX.

Performance

FITWX vs. URFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class I (FITWX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FITWX achieves a 5.92% return, which is significantly lower than URFFX's 13.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FITWX has underperformed URFFX with an annualized return of 7.67%, while URFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.12% annualized return.

FITWX

• 1D: 1.28%
• 1M: -1.04%
• 6M: 3.68%
• YTD: 5.92%
• 1Y: 12.83%
• 3Y*: 11.09%
• 5Y*: 5.02%
• 10Y*: 7.67%
• ALL TIME*: 6.06%

URFFX

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: 0.64%
• 6M: 9.62%
• YTD: 13.05%
• 1Y: 24.29%
• 3Y*: 16.22%
• 5Y*: 9.38%
• 10Y*: 10.12%
• ALL TIME*: 8.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FITWX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FITWX vs. URFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FITWX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class I	5.92%	16.17%	7.91%	13.53%	-16.64%	9.85%	14.20%	20.29%	-5.46%	15.00%
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund	13.05%	19.35%	11.86%	18.12%	-15.66%	17.70%	10.52%	20.16%	-9.01%	19.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FITWX and URFFX is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2008	0.96

The correlation between FITWX and URFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FITWX vs. URFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FITWX

FITWX Risk / Return Rank: 48
FITWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
FITWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FITWX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
FITWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
FITWX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

URFFX

URFFX Risk / Return Rank: 83
URFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
URFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
URFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
URFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
URFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FITWX vs. URFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class I (FITWX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FITWX	URFFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	1.91	-0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	2.69	-0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.35	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	2.87	-0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.72	12.30	-4.58

FITWX vs. URFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FITWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the URFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FITWX and URFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FITWX vs. URFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITWX drawdown since its inception was -49.25%, which is greater than URFFX's maximum drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITWX and URFFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FITWX	URFFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.25%	-44.25%	-5.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.46%	-7.89%	+1.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.67%	-14.14%	+5.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.68%	-23.76%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.68%	-29.97%	+6.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.93%	-0.17%	-1.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.66%	-5.88%	+0.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	1.84%	-0.24%

Volatility

FITWX vs. URFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class I (FITWX) is 2.70%, while USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that FITWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FITWX	URFFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.70%	2.93%	-0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.74%	9.82%	-2.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.95%	11.86%	-2.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.05%	13.97%	-3.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.11%	14.33%	-4.22%

FITWX vs. URFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FITWX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than URFFX's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

FITWX vs. URFFX - Dividend Comparison

FITWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.78%, more than URFFX's 5.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FITWX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class I	7.78%	7.67%	2.64%	2.01%	9.01%	9.32%	6.30%	6.62%	9.78%	4.11%	4.64%	5.26%
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund	5.72%	6.46%	2.61%	3.39%	11.40%	8.13%	6.25%	11.76%	10.21%	5.55%	3.91%	2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FITWX and URFFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, FITWX and URFFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FITWX or URFFX?

URFFX has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to FITWX (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FITWX dropped -49.25% vs URFFX's -44.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

URFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.