PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FITLX vs. PRBLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FITLX vs. PRBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity US Sustainability Index Fund (FITLX) and Parnassus Core Equity Fund (PRBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FITLX achieves a 10.47% return, which is significantly higher than PRBLX's 6.73% return.


FITLX

1D
-0.44%
1M
5.58%
YTD
10.47%
6M
11.11%
1Y
28.82%
3Y*
22.72%
5Y*
14.20%
10Y*

PRBLX

1D
0.10%
1M
4.10%
YTD
6.73%
6M
5.90%
1Y
15.02%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
13.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FITLX vs. PRBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FITLX
Fidelity US Sustainability Index Fund
10.47%18.77%23.59%29.04%-20.28%31.55%18.69%31.54%-3.32%13.07%
PRBLX
Parnassus Core Equity Fund
6.73%11.67%18.58%24.97%-18.64%27.59%21.21%30.68%-0.30%10.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FITLX and PRBLX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2017

0.95

The correlation between FITLX and PRBLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FITLX vs. PRBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FITLX
FITLX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FITLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FITLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FITLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FITLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FITLX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

PRBLX
PRBLX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PRBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PRBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FITLX vs. PRBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Sustainability Index Fund (FITLX) and Parnassus Core Equity Fund (PRBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FITLXPRBLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.24

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

1.37

+1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.60

5.35

+6.25

FITLX vs. PRBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FITLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the PRBLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FITLX and PRBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FITLXPRBLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

1.36

+0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.64

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.71

+0.11

Drawdowns

FITLX vs. PRBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITLX drawdown since its inception was -34.35%, smaller than the maximum PRBLX drawdown of -42.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITLX and PRBLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FITLXPRBLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.35%

-42.20%

+7.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.15%

-11.63%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.99%

-16.31%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.91%

-26.31%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

0.00%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-4.05%

-1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

2.97%

-0.41%

Volatility

FITLX vs. PRBLX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity US Sustainability Index Fund (FITLX) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to Parnassus Core Equity Fund (PRBLX) at 3.03%. This indicates that FITLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FITLXPRBLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

3.03%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.77%

9.12%

+0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.76%

11.78%

+0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.58%

16.25%

+1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.10%

17.27%

+1.83%

FITLX vs. PRBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FITLX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than PRBLX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

FITLX vs. PRBLX - Dividend Comparison

FITLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than PRBLX's 17.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FITLX
Fidelity US Sustainability Index Fund
1.00%1.11%1.29%1.12%1.49%0.99%1.01%1.41%1.58%0.76%0.00%0.00%
PRBLX
Parnassus Core Equity Fund
17.83%19.08%10.00%6.01%10.13%7.77%5.87%8.02%9.64%7.16%3.80%9.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FITLX and PRBLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FITLX has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to PRBLX (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FITLX dropped -34.35% vs PRBLX's -42.20%.

FITLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FITLX and PRBLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer