FITFX vs. LIAGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FITFX (Fidelity Flex International Index Fund) and LIAGX (Lord Abbett International Growth Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, FITFX returned 20.37%/yr vs 21.75%/yr for LIAGX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FITFX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for LIAGX.

Performance

FITFX vs. LIAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex International Index Fund (FITFX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FITFX achieves a 16.24% return, which is significantly lower than LIAGX's 27.78% return.

FITFX

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 6.16%
• YTD: 16.24%
• 6M: 19.13%
• 1Y: 34.57%
• 3Y*: 20.37%
• 5Y*: 9.17%
• 10Y*: —

LIAGX

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 10.09%
• YTD: 27.78%
• 6M: 28.66%
• 1Y: 41.65%
• 3Y*: 21.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FITFX vs. LIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FITFX Fidelity Flex International Index Fund	16.24%	33.21%	5.37%	15.45%	-15.72%	-2.13%
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund	27.78%	25.09%	9.43%	15.73%	-26.63%	0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FITFX and LIAGX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021	0.93

The correlation between FITFX and LIAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FITFX vs. LIAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FITFX

FITFX Risk / Return Rank: 61
FITFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FITFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FITFX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
FITFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FITFX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

LIAGX

LIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 48
LIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
LIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
LIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
LIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
LIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FITFX vs. LIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex International Index Fund (FITFX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FITFX	LIAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	1.99	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	2.71	+0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.36	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	2.82	+0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.95	11.32	+0.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FITFX vs. LIAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FITFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the LIAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FITFX and LIAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FITFX	LIAGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	1.99	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.45	+0.16

Drawdowns

FITFX vs. LIAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITFX drawdown since its inception was -34.84%, smaller than the maximum LIAGX drawdown of -37.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITFX and LIAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FITFX	LIAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.84%	-37.87%	+3.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.22%	-14.56%	+3.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.35%	-17.11%	+3.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.44%	-13.24%	+5.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.86%	3.62%	-0.76%

Volatility

FITFX vs. LIAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Flex International Index Fund (FITFX) is 4.92%, while Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) has a volatility of 8.29%. This indicates that FITFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FITFX	LIAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.92%	8.29%	-3.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.26%	18.01%	-5.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.64%	20.68%	-6.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.38%	18.79%	-3.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.34%	18.79%	-2.45%

FITFX vs. LIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FITFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than LIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

FITFX vs. LIAGX - Dividend Comparison

FITFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, more than LIAGX's 0.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FITFX Fidelity Flex International Index Fund	2.48%	2.88%	2.77%	2.67%	2.60%	2.25%	1.50%	2.54%	1.92%	1.70%
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund	0.30%	0.38%	0.48%	0.71%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FITFX and LIAGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, FITFX and LIAGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FITFX or LIAGX?

LIAGX has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to FITFX (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FITFX dropped -34.84% vs LIAGX's -37.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FITFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.