PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FITFX vs. FSPSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FITFX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex International Index Fund (FITFX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FITFX achieves a 16.42% return, which is significantly higher than FSPSX's 10.54% return.


FITFX

1D
1.46%
1M
3.34%
YTD
16.42%
6M
17.33%
1Y
35.23%
3Y*
19.10%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*

FSPSX

1D
0.76%
1M
1.93%
YTD
10.54%
6M
11.05%
1Y
25.44%
3Y*
16.37%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
9.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FITFX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FITFX
Fidelity Flex International Index Fund
16.42%33.21%5.37%15.45%-15.72%7.76%10.77%21.44%-13.97%21.09%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
10.54%31.98%3.70%18.31%-14.23%11.45%8.16%22.03%-13.55%20.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FITFX and FSPSX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2017

0.96

The correlation between FITFX and FSPSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FITFX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FITFX
FITFX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FITFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FITFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FITFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FITFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FITFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPSX
FSPSX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FSPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FITFX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex International Index Fund (FITFX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FITFXFSPSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.29

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

2.15

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.79

8.05

+3.74

FITFX vs. FSPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FITFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the FSPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FITFX and FSPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FITFX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITFX drawdown since its inception was -34.84%, roughly equal to the maximum FSPSX drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITFX and FSPSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FITFXFSPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.84%

-33.69%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.22%

-11.39%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.35%

-13.58%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.54%

-29.41%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.41%

-6.53%

-0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

3.04%

-0.13%

Volatility

FITFX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Flex International Index Fund (FITFX) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) at 4.93%. This indicates that FITFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FITFXFSPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

4.93%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.52%

12.71%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.62%

15.26%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.57%

16.07%

-0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.40%

16.56%

-0.16%

FITFX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FITFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FITFX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison

FITFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than FSPSX's 2.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FITFX
Fidelity Flex International Index Fund
2.48%2.88%2.77%2.67%2.60%2.25%1.50%2.54%1.92%1.70%0.00%0.00%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
2.85%3.15%3.27%2.79%2.66%3.07%1.84%3.18%2.79%2.50%3.08%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FITFX and FSPSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FITFX has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to FSPSX (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FITFX dropped -34.84% vs FSPSX's -33.69%.

FITFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FITFX and FSPSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer