PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FITFX vs. BSNSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FITFX vs. BSNSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex International Index Fund (FITFX) and Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund (BSNSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FITFX vs. BSNSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FITFX
Fidelity Flex International Index Fund
2.15%33.21%5.37%15.45%-15.72%7.76%10.77%3.78%
BSNSX
Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund
0.24%4.83%2.92%6.53%-5.54%2.00%8.13%0.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FITFX achieves a 2.15% return, which is significantly higher than BSNSX's 0.24% return.


FITFX

1D
3.01%
1M
-6.91%
YTD
2.15%
6M
6.52%
1Y
27.50%
3Y*
15.68%
5Y*
7.46%
10Y*

BSNSX

1D
0.19%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
0.24%
6M
1.50%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
3.97%
5Y*
1.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FITFX vs. BSNSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FITFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BSNSX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FITFX vs. BSNSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FITFX
FITFX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FITFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FITFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FITFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FITFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FITFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

BSNSX
BSNSX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BSNSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSNSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSNSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BSNSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSNSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FITFX vs. BSNSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex International Index Fund (FITFX) and Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund (BSNSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FITFXBSNSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.73

1.65

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.31

2.15

+0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.48

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

1.65

+0.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.81

6.94

+1.87

FITFX vs. BSNSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FITFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the BSNSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FITFX and BSNSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FITFXBSNSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

1.65

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.76

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.90

-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between FITFX and BSNSX is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FITFX vs. BSNSX - Dividend Comparison

FITFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, less than BSNSX's 3.33% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FITFX
Fidelity Flex International Index Fund
2.82%2.88%2.77%2.67%2.60%2.25%1.50%2.54%1.92%1.70%
BSNSX
Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund
3.33%3.32%3.28%2.99%1.84%1.33%1.99%0.15%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FITFX vs. BSNSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITFX drawdown since its inception was -34.84%, which is greater than BSNSX's maximum drawdown of -9.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITFX and BSNSX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FITFXBSNSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.84%

-9.77%

-25.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.22%

-2.91%

-8.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.74%

-9.77%

-19.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.55%

-1.51%

-7.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.54%

-1.60%

-5.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

0.69%

+2.22%

Volatility

FITFX vs. BSNSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Flex International Index Fund (FITFX) has a higher volatility of 7.98% compared to Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund (BSNSX) at 0.76%. This indicates that FITFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSNSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FITFXBSNSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.98%

0.76%

+7.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

1.05%

+10.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.42%

2.82%

+13.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.19%

2.65%

+12.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.31%

3.39%

+12.92%