FISZX vs. LIAGX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FISZX (Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund) and LIAGX (Lord Abbett International Growth Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, FISZX returned 22.13%/yr vs 21.49%/yr for LIAGX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FISZX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for LIAGX.

Performance

FISZX vs. LIAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FISZX having a 26.54% return and LIAGX slightly higher at 26.97%.

FISZX

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 11.13%
• YTD: 26.54%
• 6M: 33.08%
• 1Y: 40.89%
• 3Y*: 22.13%
• 5Y*: 8.77%
• 10Y*: —

LIAGX

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 9.49%
• YTD: 26.97%
• 6M: 28.29%
• 1Y: 39.93%
• 3Y*: 21.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FISZX vs. LIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FISZX Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund	26.54%	31.77%	3.61%	15.83%	-28.32%	5.49%
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund	26.97%	25.09%	9.43%	15.73%	-26.63%	0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FISZX and LIAGX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021	0.90

The correlation between FISZX and LIAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FISZX vs. LIAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FISZX

FISZX Risk / Return Rank: 57
FISZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FISZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FISZX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FISZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FISZX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

LIAGX

LIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 50
LIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
LIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
LIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
LIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
LIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FISZX vs. LIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FISZX	LIAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	2.02	+0.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	2.76	+0.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.36	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	2.86	+0.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.85	11.49	+0.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FISZX vs. LIAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FISZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the LIAGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FISZX and LIAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FISZX	LIAGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.27	2.02	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.44	+0.21

Drawdowns

FISZX vs. LIAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FISZX drawdown since its inception was -39.92%, which is greater than LIAGX's maximum drawdown of -37.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISZX and LIAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FISZX	LIAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.92%	-37.87%	-2.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.48%	-14.56%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.63%	-17.11%	+2.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.38%	-13.25%	+0.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.66%	3.62%	+0.04%

Volatility

FISZX vs. LIAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX) is 7.80%, while Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) has a volatility of 8.34%. This indicates that FISZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FISZX	LIAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.80%	8.34%	-0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.25%	18.00%	-1.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.97%	20.72%	-1.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.84%	18.80%	-0.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.27%	18.80%	-0.53%

FISZX vs. LIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FISZX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than LIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

FISZX vs. LIAGX - Dividend Comparison

FISZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than LIAGX's 0.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FISZX Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund	1.52%	1.92%	2.55%	1.89%	1.37%	6.08%	0.90%	0.27%
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund	0.30%	0.38%	0.48%	0.71%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FISZX and LIAGX in my portfolio?

FISZX and LIAGX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FISZX or LIAGX?

LIAGX has higher volatility (8.34%) compared to FISZX (7.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FISZX dropped -39.92% vs LIAGX's -37.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FISZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.