PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FISZX vs. GSINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FISZX vs. GSINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FISZX achieves a 27.01% return, which is significantly higher than GSINX's 6.39% return.


FISZX

1D
0.37%
1M
11.60%
YTD
27.01%
6M
32.57%
1Y
42.44%
3Y*
22.28%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*

GSINX

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
6.39%
6M
7.92%
1Y
12.58%
3Y*
17.02%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FISZX vs. GSINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
27.01%31.77%3.61%15.83%-28.32%9.91%23.49%13.42%
GSINX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
6.39%20.76%9.53%21.93%-11.14%12.35%15.64%14.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FISZX and GSINX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between FISZX and GSINX has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FISZX vs. GSINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FISZX
FISZX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FISZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FISZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

GSINX
GSINX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GSINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSINX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
GSINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSINX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FISZX vs. GSINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FISZXGSINXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.21

1.25

+0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.01

1.76

+1.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.23

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

1.55

+1.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.38

5.17

+6.21

FISZX vs. GSINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FISZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the GSINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FISZX and GSINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FISZXGSINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

1.25

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.63

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.81

-0.16

Drawdowns

FISZX vs. GSINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FISZX drawdown since its inception was -39.92%, which is greater than GSINX's maximum drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISZX and GSINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FISZXGSINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.92%

-28.80%

-11.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.48%

-7.80%

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.63%

-10.32%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.92%

-25.46%

-14.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.72%

+3.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.37%

-4.85%

-7.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

2.33%

+1.33%

Volatility

FISZX vs. GSINX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX) has a higher volatility of 7.78% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX) at 2.75%. This indicates that FISZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FISZXGSINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.78%

2.75%

+5.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.22%

7.89%

+8.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.93%

9.68%

+9.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.84%

14.37%

+3.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

15.69%

+2.58%

FISZX vs. GSINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FISZX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than GSINX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

FISZX vs. GSINX - Dividend Comparison

FISZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than GSINX's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
1.52%1.92%2.55%1.89%1.37%6.08%0.90%0.27%0.00%0.00%
GSINX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
4.73%5.03%11.11%2.27%4.79%2.13%0.08%0.57%0.43%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


FISZX and GSINX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FISZX has higher volatility (7.78%) compared to GSINX (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FISZX dropped -39.92% vs GSINX's -28.80%.

FISZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FISZX and GSINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer