PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FISV vs. MO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FISV vs. MO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fiserv, Inc (FISV) and Altria Group, Inc. (MO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FISV achieves a -21.51% return, which is significantly lower than MO's 25.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FISV has underperformed MO with an annualized return of -0.09%, while MO has yielded a comparatively higher 7.79% annualized return.


FISV

1D
-3.14%
1M
-4.97%
YTD
-21.51%
6M
-19.79%
1Y
-68.38%
3Y*
-23.30%
5Y*
-13.85%
10Y*
-0.09%

MO

1D
-1.25%
1M
4.65%
YTD
25.71%
6M
27.02%
1Y
28.81%
3Y*
25.85%
5Y*
16.08%
10Y*
7.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FISV vs. MO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FISV
Fiserv, Inc
-21.51%-67.30%54.64%31.43%-2.62%-8.84%-1.53%57.34%12.09%23.38%
MO
Altria Group, Inc.
25.71%18.17%40.76%-3.70%4.37%24.18%-10.21%7.87%-27.14%9.45%

Correlation

The correlation between FISV and MO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1990

0.23

The correlation between FISV and MO shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.23 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FISV:

$28.23B

MO:

$119.27B

EPS

FISV:

$5.91

MO:

$4.79

PE Ratio

FISV:

8.92

MO:

14.87

PEG Ratio

FISV:

0.24

MO:

0.32

PS Ratio

FISV:

1.35

MO:

5.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

FISV:

$21.09B

MO:

$21.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FISV:

$9.52B

MO:

$14.80B

EBITDA (TTM)

FISV:

$7.75B

MO:

$11.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FISV vs. MO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FISV
FISV Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FISV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISV Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISV Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
FISV Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISV Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

MO
MO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
MO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
MO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
MO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
MO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FISV vs. MO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fiserv, Inc (FISV) and Altria Group, Inc. (MO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FISVMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.64

1.25

-0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

1.76

-2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.31

4.45

-5.76

FISV vs. MO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FISV Sharpe Ratio is -1.23, which is lower than the MO Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FISV and MO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FISVMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.23

1.29

-2.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

0.78

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

0.34

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.69

-0.28

Drawdowns

FISV vs. MO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FISV drawdown since its inception was -77.98%, which is greater than MO's maximum drawdown of -65.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISV and MO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FISVMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.98%

-65.43%

-12.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.17%

-16.40%

-53.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.98%

-16.40%

-61.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.98%

-25.83%

-52.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.98%

-53.69%

-24.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.83%

-4.37%

-73.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.15%

-11.93%

+0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

52.12%

6.49%

+45.63%

Volatility

FISV vs. MO - Volatility Comparison

Fiserv, Inc (FISV) has a higher volatility of 12.06% compared to Altria Group, Inc. (MO) at 6.69%. This indicates that FISV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FISVMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.06%

6.69%

+5.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.32%

17.32%

+9.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.01%

22.53%

+33.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.60%

20.64%

+14.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.62%

22.96%

+8.66%

Dividends

FISV vs. MO - Dividend Comparison

FISV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FISV
Fiserv, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MO
Altria Group, Inc.
5.89%7.21%7.65%9.52%8.05%7.43%8.29%6.57%6.07%3.56%3.48%3.73%

Financials

FISV vs. MO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fiserv, Inc and Altria Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B4.50B5.00B5.50B6.00B20222023202420252026
5.03B
5.43B
(FISV) Total Revenue
(MO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FISV vs. MO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fiserv, Inc and Altria Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
64.6%
Portfolio components
FISV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fiserv, Inc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.51B and revenue of 5.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.6%.

FISV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fiserv, Inc reported an operating income of 918.00M and revenue of 5.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.3%.

MO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.96B and revenue of 5.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 54.5%.

FISV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fiserv, Inc reported a net income of 571.00M and revenue of 5.03B, resulting in a net margin of 11.4%.

MO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 5.43B, resulting in a net margin of 40.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FISV and MO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FISV has higher volatility (12.06%) compared to MO (6.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FISV dropped -77.98% vs MO's -65.43%.

MO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs -1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FISV and MO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer