FISV vs. HWM
FISV (Fiserv, Inc) and HWM (Howmet Aerospace Inc.) are both stocks. FISV operates in Software - Application (Technology), while HWM operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, FISV returned 0.17%/yr vs 33.28%/yr for HWM. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FISV vs. HWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FISV achieves a -19.93% return, which is significantly lower than HWM's 29.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FISV has underperformed HWM with an annualized return of 0.17%, while HWM has yielded a comparatively higher 33.28% annualized return.
FISV
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 2.69%
- YTD
- -19.93%
- 6M
- -21.77%
- 1Y
- -67.99%
- 3Y*
- -23.21%
- 5Y*
- -13.37%
- 10Y*
- 0.17%
HWM
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -3.09%
- YTD
- 29.23%
- 6M
- 33.60%
- 1Y
- 54.66%
- 3Y*
- 79.69%
- 5Y*
- 50.00%
- 10Y*
- 33.28%
FISV vs. HWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FISV Fiserv, Inc | -19.93% | -67.30% | 54.64% | 31.43% | -2.62% | -8.84% | -1.53% | 57.34% | 12.09% | 23.38% |
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 29.23% | 87.95% | 102.71% | 37.84% | 24.16% | 11.67% | 21.03% | 83.54% | -37.43% | 48.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between FISV and HWM is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.30 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FISV and HWM has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
FISV:
$28.79B
HWM:
$106.66B
FISV:
$5.91
HWM:
$4.31
FISV:
9.10
HWM:
61.42
FISV:
0.25
HWM:
1.04
FISV:
1.38
HWM:
12.42
FISV:
1.10
HWM:
19.32
FISV:
$21.09B
HWM:
$8.62B
FISV:
$9.52B
HWM:
$2.81B
FISV:
$7.75B
HWM:
$2.66B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FISV vs. HWM — Risk / Return Rank
FISV
HWM
FISV vs. HWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fiserv, Inc (FISV) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FISV | HWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.64 | 1.30 | -0.65 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 3.46 | -4.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | 9.77 | -11.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FISV vs. HWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FISV drawdown since its inception was -77.98%, smaller than the maximum HWM drawdown of -88.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISV and HWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FISV | HWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.98% | -88.30% | +10.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.17% | -15.89% | -54.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.98% | -19.41% | -58.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.98% | -21.61% | -56.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.98% | -64.81% | -13.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.38% | -3.26% | -74.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.18% | -31.00% | +19.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 52.85% | 5.61% | +47.24% |
Volatility
FISV vs. HWM - Volatility Comparison
Fiserv, Inc (FISV) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) have volatilities of 11.15% and 11.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FISV | HWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.15% | 11.03% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.49% | 25.03% | +1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.98% | 31.46% | +24.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.61% | 32.20% | +3.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.62% | 39.82% | -8.20% |
Dividends
FISV vs. HWM - Dividend Comparison
FISV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FISV Fiserv, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.31% | 0.25% | 0.13% | 0.05% | 0.39% | 1.42% | 0.88% | 40.49% | 1.22% |
Financials
FISV vs. HWM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fiserv, Inc and Howmet Aerospace Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FISV vs. HWM - Profitability Comparison
FISV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fiserv, Inc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
HWM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a gross profit of 854.00M and revenue of 2.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
FISV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fiserv, Inc reported an operating income of 918.00M and revenue of 5.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.3%.
HWM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported an operating income of 734.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.
FISV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fiserv, Inc reported a net income of 571.00M and revenue of 5.03B, resulting in a net margin of 11.4%.
HWM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a net income of 580.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in a net margin of 25.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FISV and HWM have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FISV has higher volatility (11.15%) compared to HWM (11.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FISV dropped -77.98% vs HWM's -88.30%.
HWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FISV and HWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer