FISR vs. XLK
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF (FISR) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK).
FISR and XLK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FISR is an actively managed fund by State Street. It was launched on Apr 2, 2019. XLK is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.
Performance
FISR vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FISR vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FISR SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF | -0.07% | 6.32% | 1.01% | 5.28% | -15.73% | -1.70% | 5.86% | 6.81% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | -6.18% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 22.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FISR achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's -6.18% return.
FISR
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 0.55%
- 1Y
- 3.07%
- 3Y*
- 2.98%
- 5Y*
- -0.58%
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- YTD
- -6.18%
- 6M
- -4.94%
- 1Y
- 30.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.19%
- 5Y*
- 15.65%
- 10Y*
- 21.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FISR vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
FISR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FISR vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
FISR
XLK
FISR vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF (FISR) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FISR | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | 1.13 | -0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.87 | 1.71 | -0.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.24 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 1.97 | -0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.83 | 6.31 | -3.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FISR | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 1.13 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | 0.64 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.36 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between FISR and XLK is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FISR vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
FISR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, more than XLK's 0.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FISR SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF | 4.11% | 3.97% | 3.59% | 3.50% | 2.19% | 1.87% | 2.47% | 2.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.57% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Drawdowns
FISR vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FISR drawdown since its inception was -20.27%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISR and XLK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FISR | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.27% | -82.05% | +61.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.31% | -15.92% | +12.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.10% | -33.56% | +13.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.43% | -11.04% | +4.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.74% | -35.17% | +27.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.23% | 4.98% | -3.75% |
Volatility
FISR vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF (FISR) is 1.97%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 8.12%. This indicates that FISR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FISR | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.97% | 8.12% | -6.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.06% | 16.49% | -13.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.99% | 27.05% | -22.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.56% | 24.72% | -18.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.39% | 24.33% | -17.94% |