PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FISNX vs. FRQAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FISNX vs. FRQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2010 Fund (FISNX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FISNX achieves a 5.31% return, which is significantly higher than FRQAX's 3.69% return.


FISNX

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.32%
YTD
5.31%
6M
5.65%
1Y
12.25%
3Y*
9.30%
5Y*
3.88%
10Y*

FRQAX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.97%
YTD
3.69%
6M
3.95%
1Y
9.39%
3Y*
7.30%
5Y*
2.49%
10Y*
4.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FISNX vs. FRQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FISNX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2010 Fund
5.31%11.53%5.63%10.21%-13.01%5.62%10.81%14.65%-3.42%5.51%
FRQAX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A
3.69%9.54%4.21%8.24%-12.60%3.56%9.32%12.33%-3.06%4.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FISNX and FRQAX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.98

The correlation between FISNX and FRQAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FISNX vs. FRQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FISNX
FISNX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FISNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FISNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQAX
FRQAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FRQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FISNX vs. FRQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2010 Fund (FISNX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FISNXFRQAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.47

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

2.86

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.34

12.17

+2.17

FISNX vs. FRQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FISNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the FRQAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FISNX and FRQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FISNXFRQAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

2.38

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.45

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.50

+0.37

Drawdowns

FISNX vs. FRQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FISNX drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, smaller than the maximum FRQAX drawdown of -38.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISNX and FRQAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FISNXFRQAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.11%

-38.22%

+20.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.91%

-3.46%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.77%

-5.27%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.11%

-17.24%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.26%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-4.57%

+1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

0.81%

+0.09%

Volatility

FISNX vs. FRQAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2010 Fund (FISNX) has a higher volatility of 2.02% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX) at 1.68%. This indicates that FISNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FISNXFRQAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

1.68%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.20%

3.42%

+0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.00%

4.16%

+0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.42%

5.56%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.42%

5.33%

+1.09%

FISNX vs. FRQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FISNX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQAX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

FISNX vs. FRQAX - Dividend Comparison

FISNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than FRQAX's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FISNX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2010 Fund
4.02%3.68%4.39%3.17%5.92%6.53%3.63%5.29%5.20%2.34%0.00%0.00%
FRQAX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A
2.83%2.72%2.71%2.46%4.74%5.76%3.26%2.93%5.33%16.05%2.18%3.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FISNX and FRQAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FISNX has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to FRQAX (1.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FISNX dropped -18.11% vs FRQAX's -38.22%.

FISNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FISNX and FRQAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer