PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIRSX vs. URFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIRSX vs. URFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2015 Fund (FIRSX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FIRSX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

URFFX

1D
-0.35%
1M
-0.75%
6M
10.11%
YTD
11.62%
1Y
21.40%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
9.23%
10Y*
10.03%
ALL TIME*
8.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIRSX vs. URFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIRSX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2015 Fund
4.25%11.12%5.17%9.63%-13.52%5.32%10.88%14.45%-3.68%12.08%
URFFX
USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund
11.62%19.35%11.86%18.12%-15.66%17.70%10.52%20.16%-9.01%19.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FIRSX and URFFX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2008

0.91

The correlation between FIRSX and URFFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (3 years) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIRSX vs. URFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIRSX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


URFFX
URFFX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
URFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
URFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
URFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
URFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIRSX vs. URFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2015 Fund (FIRSX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIRSXURFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.81

FIRSX vs. URFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIRSX vs. URFFX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIRSXURFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

Volatility

FIRSX vs. URFFX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIRSXURFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.33%

FIRSX vs. URFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIRSX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than URFFX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIRSX vs. URFFX - Dividend Comparison

FIRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, less than URFFX's 5.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIRSX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2015 Fund
2.95%3.01%2.89%2.68%4.92%5.21%3.39%3.24%6.33%24.28%2.04%4.48%
URFFX
USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund
5.79%6.46%2.61%3.39%11.40%8.13%6.25%11.76%10.21%5.55%3.91%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIRSX and URFFX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIRSX and URFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer