PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIRQX vs. LTIUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIRQX vs. LTIUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund (FIRQX) and Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FIRQX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LTIUX

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.00%
6M
4.21%
YTD
6.25%
1Y
13.53%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*
9.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIRQX vs. LTIUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIRQX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund
3.60%9.97%4.48%8.52%-12.39%3.82%9.59%12.62%-2.83%10.63%
LTIUX
Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund
6.25%14.26%14.13%16.51%-17.48%14.07%15.70%23.48%-7.37%19.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FIRQX and LTIUX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2008

0.92

The correlation between FIRQX and LTIUX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (5 years) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIRQX vs. LTIUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIRQX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


LTIUX
LTIUX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LTIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LTIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIRQX vs. LTIUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund (FIRQX) and Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIRQXLTIUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.72

FIRQX vs. LTIUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIRQX vs. LTIUX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIRQXLTIUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

Volatility

FIRQX vs. LTIUX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIRQXLTIUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.42%

FIRQX vs. LTIUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIRQX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than LTIUX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIRQX vs. LTIUX - Dividend Comparison

FIRQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, less than LTIUX's 8.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIRQX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund
3.17%3.14%2.95%2.75%5.01%6.00%3.50%3.15%5.59%16.31%2.43%4.08%
LTIUX
Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund
8.50%9.03%9.46%4.17%7.50%7.06%5.35%7.28%7.75%5.46%4.28%5.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIRQX and LTIUX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIRQX and LTIUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer