FIRQX vs. FTTWX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FIRQX (Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund) and FTTWX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class M) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. FIRQX charges 0.46%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for FTTWX.

Performance

FIRQX vs. FTTWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund (FIRQX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class M (FTTWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FIRQX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

FTTWX

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: -1.15%
• 6M: 3.38%
• YTD: 5.60%
• 1Y: 12.31%
• 3Y*: 10.52%
• 5Y*: 4.48%
• 10Y*: 7.17%
• ALL TIME*: 5.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FTTWX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class M	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FIRQX vs. FTTWX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIRQX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund	3.60%	9.97%	4.48%	8.52%	-12.39%	3.82%	9.59%	12.62%	-2.83%	10.63%
FTTWX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class M	5.60%	15.50%	7.43%	12.89%	-17.06%	9.39%	13.61%	19.66%	-5.90%	14.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FIRQX and FTTWX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2007	0.95

The correlation between FIRQX and FTTWX shifts across timeframes, from 0.85 (1 year) to 0.95 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FIRQX vs. FTTWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIRQX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FTTWX

FTTWX Risk / Return Rank: 44
FTTWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
FTTWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
FTTWX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
FTTWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
FTTWX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIRQX vs. FTTWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund (FIRQX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class M (FTTWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIRQX	FTTWX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.31	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.89	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.25	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.81	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.32	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FIRQX	FTTWX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-49.59%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.51%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.98%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-23.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.99%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-5.94%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.60%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FIRQX	FTTWX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.76%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.75%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	8.96%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	10.03%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	10.12%	—

FIRQX vs. FTTWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIRQX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than FTTWX's 1.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIRQX vs. FTTWX - Dividend Comparison

FIRQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, less than FTTWX's 7.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIRQX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund	2.86%	3.14%	2.95%	2.75%	5.01%	6.00%	3.50%	3.15%	5.59%	16.31%	2.43%	4.08%
FTTWX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class M	7.57%	7.42%	3.51%	1.68%	8.57%	9.02%	5.88%	6.17%	9.28%	4.01%	4.17%	4.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIRQX and FTTWX in my portfolio?

FIRQX and FTTWX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.