PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTTWX vs. PDIZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTTWX vs. PDIZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class M (FTTWX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage 2030 Fund (PDIZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTTWX achieves a 7.74% return, which is significantly higher than PDIZX's 4.70% return.


FTTWX

1D
1.00%
1M
2.18%
YTD
7.74%
6M
7.83%
1Y
17.52%
3Y*
11.85%
5Y*
5.25%
10Y*
7.72%

PDIZX

1D
0.53%
1M
1.07%
YTD
4.70%
6M
4.65%
1Y
13.50%
3Y*
12.05%
5Y*
6.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTTWX vs. PDIZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FTTWX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class M
7.74%15.50%7.43%12.89%-17.06%9.39%13.61%
PDIZX
Putnam Retirement Advantage 2030 Fund
4.70%11.93%8.54%18.82%-14.27%12.07%11.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FTTWX and PDIZX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020

0.95

The correlation between FTTWX and PDIZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTTWX vs. PDIZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTTWX
FTTWX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FTTWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTTWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTTWX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FTTWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTTWX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

PDIZX
PDIZX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
PDIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
PDIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTTWX vs. PDIZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class M (FTTWX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage 2030 Fund (PDIZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTTWXPDIZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.45

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

3.39

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.38

15.06

-3.68

FTTWX vs. PDIZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTTWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the PDIZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTTWX and PDIZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTTWX vs. PDIZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTTWX drawdown since its inception was -49.59%, which is greater than PDIZX's maximum drawdown of -21.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTTWX and PDIZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTTWXPDIZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.59%

-21.03%

-28.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.51%

-3.96%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.75%

-7.31%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.98%

-18.97%

-5.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.96%

-4.31%

-1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

0.89%

+0.64%

Volatility

FTTWX vs. PDIZX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class M (FTTWX) has a higher volatility of 3.62% compared to Putnam Retirement Advantage 2030 Fund (PDIZX) at 2.25%. This indicates that FTTWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDIZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTTWXPDIZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.62%

2.25%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.35%

4.63%

+2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.60%

5.68%

+2.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.98%

8.66%

+1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.18%

10.45%

-0.27%

FTTWX vs. PDIZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTTWX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than PDIZX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTTWX vs. PDIZX - Dividend Comparison

FTTWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than PDIZX's 7.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTTWX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class M
7.41%7.42%3.51%1.68%8.57%9.02%5.88%6.17%9.28%4.01%4.17%4.76%
PDIZX
Putnam Retirement Advantage 2030 Fund
7.29%7.63%4.91%3.15%7.76%12.48%1.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FTTWX and PDIZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTTWX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to PDIZX (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTTWX dropped -49.59% vs PDIZX's -21.03%.

PDIZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTTWX and PDIZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer