PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIRFX vs. VTCLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIRFX vs. VTCLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class I (FIRFX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares (VTCLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIRFX achieves a 6.10% return, which is significantly lower than VTCLX's 10.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FIRFX has underperformed VTCLX with an annualized return of 6.98%, while VTCLX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.38% annualized return.


FIRFX

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.65%
YTD
6.10%
6M
6.59%
1Y
14.67%
3Y*
10.71%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
6.98%

VTCLX

1D
-0.70%
1M
4.04%
YTD
10.53%
6M
10.36%
1Y
27.36%
3Y*
21.92%
5Y*
13.10%
10Y*
15.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIRFX vs. VTCLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIRFX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class I
6.10%13.43%6.55%11.83%-15.66%8.02%13.09%17.53%-5.07%14.27%
VTCLX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares
10.53%17.44%23.76%26.62%-19.07%26.87%21.08%31.47%-4.98%22.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FIRFX and VTCLX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

0.92

The correlation between FIRFX and VTCLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (3 years) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIRFX vs. VTCLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIRFX
FIRFX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FIRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FIRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VTCLX
VTCLX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VTCLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTCLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTCLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VTCLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTCLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIRFX vs. VTCLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class I (FIRFX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares (VTCLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIRFXVTCLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.41

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

3.13

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.99

14.54

-1.55

FIRFX vs. VTCLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIRFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the VTCLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIRFX and VTCLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIRFXVTCLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.29

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.76

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.84

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.53

-0.01

Drawdowns

FIRFX vs. VTCLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIRFX drawdown since its inception was -41.29%, smaller than the maximum VTCLX drawdown of -55.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIRFX and VTCLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIRFXVTCLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.29%

-55.18%

+13.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.11%

-8.79%

+3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.25%

-19.01%

+11.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.56%

-24.98%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.56%

-34.56%

+13.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.70%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.21%

-7.56%

+2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

1.89%

-0.72%

Volatility

FIRFX vs. VTCLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class I (FIRFX) is 2.39%, while Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares (VTCLX) has a volatility of 2.95%. This indicates that FIRFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTCLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIRFXVTCLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.39%

2.95%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.27%

9.10%

-3.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.37%

12.03%

-5.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.18%

17.22%

-9.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.36%

18.27%

-9.91%

FIRFX vs. VTCLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIRFX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than VTCLX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIRFX vs. VTCLX - Dividend Comparison

FIRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than VTCLX's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIRFX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class I
3.72%2.66%2.56%2.43%4.63%5.08%3.57%3.80%7.10%24.68%2.44%4.49%
VTCLX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares
0.85%0.93%1.04%1.24%1.47%1.04%1.32%1.52%1.83%1.57%1.76%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIRFX and VTCLX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTCLX has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to FIRFX (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIRFX dropped -41.29% vs VTCLX's -55.18%.

FIRFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIRFX and VTCLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer