PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIRFX vs. FHVDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIRFX vs. FHVDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class I (FIRFX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K (FHVDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIRFX achieves a 4.52% return, which is significantly lower than FHVDX's 11.88% return.


FIRFX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
4.52%
6M
4.17%
1Y
11.76%
3Y*
9.66%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*
6.89%

FHVDX

1D
-2.24%
1M
0.73%
YTD
11.88%
6M
11.11%
1Y
26.01%
3Y*
20.37%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIRFX vs. FHVDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIRFX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class I
4.52%13.43%6.55%11.83%-15.66%8.02%13.09%17.53%-7.01%
FHVDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K
11.88%22.76%16.52%20.62%-18.95%16.33%17.94%26.57%-11.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FIRFX and FHVDX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018

0.94

The correlation between FIRFX and FHVDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIRFX vs. FHVDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIRFX
FIRFX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FIRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FIRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FHVDX
FHVDX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FHVDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHVDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHVDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FHVDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHVDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIRFX vs. FHVDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class I (FIRFX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K (FHVDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIRFXFHVDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.38

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

2.88

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.52

12.46

-1.94

FIRFX vs. FHVDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIRFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the FHVDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIRFX and FHVDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIRFX vs. FHVDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIRFX drawdown since its inception was -41.29%, which is greater than FHVDX's maximum drawdown of -31.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIRFX and FHVDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIRFXFHVDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.29%

-31.31%

-9.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.11%

-9.68%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.25%

-15.49%

+8.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.56%

-27.81%

+6.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-2.41%

+0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

-5.86%

+0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

2.23%

-1.00%

Volatility

FIRFX vs. FHVDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class I (FIRFX) is 2.18%, while Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K (FHVDX) has a volatility of 6.15%. This indicates that FIRFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHVDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIRFXFHVDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.18%

6.15%

-3.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.48%

11.77%

-6.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.52%

13.83%

-7.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.21%

15.34%

-7.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.37%

16.96%

-8.59%

FIRFX vs. FHVDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIRFX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than FHVDX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIRFX vs. FHVDX - Dividend Comparison

FIRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, more than FHVDX's 3.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHVDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K
3.30%2.41%5.08%1.95%6.13%8.35%4.57%3.15%3.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FIRFX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class I
3.66%2.66%2.56%2.43%4.63%5.08%3.57%3.80%7.10%24.68%2.44%4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FIRFX and FHVDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHVDX has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to FIRFX (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIRFX dropped -41.29% vs FHVDX's -31.31%.

FHVDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIRFX and FHVDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer