FHVDX vs. STLFX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FHVDX (Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K) and STLFX (BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FHVDX returned 11.17%/yr vs 8.68%/yr for STLFX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FHVDX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for STLFX.

Performance

FHVDX vs. STLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K (FHVDX) and BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund (STLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHVDX achieves a 14.64% return, which is significantly higher than STLFX's 12.43% return.

FHVDX

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: 3.21%
• YTD: 14.64%
• 6M: 14.59%
• 1Y: 31.72%
• 3Y*: 20.49%
• 5Y*: 11.17%
• 10Y*: —

STLFX

• 1D: 1.28%
• 1M: 1.64%
• YTD: 12.43%
• 6M: 12.13%
• 1Y: 28.17%
• 3Y*: 15.39%
• 5Y*: 8.68%
• 10Y*: 11.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHVDX vs. STLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FHVDX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K	14.64%	22.76%	16.52%	20.62%	-18.95%	16.33%	17.94%	26.57%	-11.80%
STLFX BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund	12.43%	20.03%	5.73%	22.31%	-18.73%	18.12%	14.82%	26.48%	-12.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FHVDX and STLFX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018	0.94

The correlation between FHVDX and STLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHVDX vs. STLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHVDX

FHVDX Risk / Return Rank: 74
FHVDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FHVDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FHVDX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FHVDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FHVDX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

STLFX

STLFX Risk / Return Rank: 56
STLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
STLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
STLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
STLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
STLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHVDX vs. STLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K (FHVDX) and BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund (STLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FHVDX	STLFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	1.94	+0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	2.69	+0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.35	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.25	2.91	+0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.13	12.46	+1.67

FHVDX vs. STLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHVDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the STLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHVDX and STLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FHVDX vs. STLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHVDX drawdown since its inception was -31.31%, smaller than the maximum STLFX drawdown of -50.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHVDX and STLFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHVDX	STLFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.31%	-50.35%	+19.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.68%	-9.45%	-0.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.49%	-23.35%	+7.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.81%	-27.07%	-0.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.63%	+0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.86%	-6.76%	+0.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	2.21%	+0.01%

Volatility

FHVDX vs. STLFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K (FHVDX) and BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund (STLFX) have volatilities of 5.80% and 5.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHVDX	STLFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.80%	5.64%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.58%	11.77%	-0.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.63%	14.19%	-0.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.30%	16.99%	-1.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.95%	16.48%	+0.47%

FHVDX vs. STLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHVDX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than STLFX's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHVDX vs. STLFX - Dividend Comparison

FHVDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than STLFX's 5.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHVDX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K	3.22%	2.41%	5.08%	1.95%	6.13%	8.35%	4.57%	3.15%	3.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
STLFX BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund	5.51%	6.20%	1.86%	2.91%	2.51%	16.88%	2.27%	6.09%	15.73%	5.87%	2.00%	9.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHVDX and STLFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, FHVDX and STLFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FHVDX or STLFX?

FHVDX has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to STLFX (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHVDX dropped -31.31% vs STLFX's -50.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHVDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.