FIQRX vs. EAPCX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FIQRX (Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class Z) and EAPCX (Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A) are both Commodities funds. Over the past 5 years, FIQRX returned 13.10%/yr vs 13.50%/yr for EAPCX. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIQRX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for EAPCX.

Performance

FIQRX vs. EAPCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class Z (FIQRX) and Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FIQRX having a 15.98% return and EAPCX slightly lower at 15.27%.

FIQRX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -5.58%
• YTD: 15.98%
• 6M: 15.37%
• 1Y: 36.65%
• 3Y*: 17.69%
• 5Y*: 13.10%
• 10Y*: —

EAPCX

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -5.86%
• YTD: 15.27%
• 6M: 14.39%
• 1Y: 28.85%
• 3Y*: 15.60%
• 5Y*: 13.50%
• 10Y*: 10.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIQRX vs. EAPCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FIQRX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class Z	15.98%	28.74%	3.10%	-5.03%	20.90%	26.24%	6.27%	18.10%	-13.01%
EAPCX Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A	15.27%	22.06%	9.63%	-4.87%	17.26%	29.92%	7.77%	9.19%	-7.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FIQRX and EAPCX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018	0.61

The correlation between FIQRX and EAPCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIQRX vs. EAPCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIQRX

FIQRX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FIQRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FIQRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FIQRX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FIQRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FIQRX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

EAPCX

EAPCX Risk / Return Rank: 54
EAPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
EAPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
EAPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
EAPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
EAPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIQRX vs. EAPCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class Z (FIQRX) and Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIQRX	EAPCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	1.99	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	2.63	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.35	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.14	2.96	+1.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.97	10.49	+4.48

FIQRX vs. EAPCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIQRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the EAPCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIQRX and EAPCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIQRX vs. EAPCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIQRX drawdown since its inception was -45.62%, smaller than the maximum EAPCX drawdown of -52.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQRX and EAPCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIQRX	EAPCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.62%	-52.59%	+6.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.72%	-9.47%	+0.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.20%	-10.57%	-8.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.18%	-18.05%	-9.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.44%	-9.47%	+1.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.38%	-22.71%	+13.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	2.69%	-0.28%

Volatility

FIQRX vs. EAPCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class Z (FIQRX) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX) at 3.29%. This indicates that FIQRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAPCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIQRX	EAPCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.35%	3.29%	+2.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.84%	11.76%	+2.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.00%	14.08%	+2.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.39%	14.56%	+6.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.21%	13.27%	+10.94%

FIQRX vs. EAPCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIQRX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPCX's 0.91% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIQRX vs. EAPCX - Dividend Comparison

FIQRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than EAPCX's 11.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EAPCX Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A	11.48%	13.23%	5.46%	3.43%	14.80%	13.74%	3.01%	1.11%	0.41%	4.98%	6.49%
FIQRX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class Z	2.22%	2.58%	2.74%	2.28%	1.99%	3.55%	1.66%	3.34%	2.58%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIQRX and EAPCX in my portfolio?

FIQRX and EAPCX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIQRX or EAPCX?

FIQRX has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to EAPCX (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIQRX dropped -45.62% vs EAPCX's -52.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIQRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.