PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIQPX vs. WAINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIQPX vs. WAINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class Z (FIQPX) and Wasatch Emerging India Fund (WAINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIQPX achieves a 23.76% return, which is significantly higher than WAINX's 0.48% return.


FIQPX

1D
3.44%
1M
-6.67%
6M
13.44%
YTD
23.76%
1Y
42.90%
3Y*
27.50%
5Y*
8.00%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.02%

WAINX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.24%
6M
10.29%
YTD
0.48%
1Y
-2.65%
3Y*
5.04%
5Y*
2.72%
10Y*
9.07%
ALL TIME*
9.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FIQPX vs. WAINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIQPX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class Z
23.76%37.22%21.13%13.98%-30.50%-14.73%73.23%31.17%0.71%
WAINX
Wasatch Emerging India Fund
0.48%-5.33%9.23%20.90%-21.77%37.56%17.63%13.78%10.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FIQPX and WAINX is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.44

The correlation between FIQPX and WAINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIQPX vs. WAINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIQPX
FIQPX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FIQPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

WAINX
WAINX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
WAINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAINX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
WAINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAINX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIQPX vs. WAINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class Z (FIQPX) and Wasatch Emerging India Fund (WAINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIQPXWAINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.98

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

-0.15

+2.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.37

-0.36

+8.73

FIQPX vs. WAINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIQPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the WAINX Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIQPX and WAINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIQPX vs. WAINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIQPX drawdown since its inception was -57.62%, which is greater than WAINX's maximum drawdown of -41.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQPX and WAINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIQPXWAINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.62%

-41.34%

-16.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.56%

-25.11%

+9.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.18%

-31.01%

+13.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.50%

-31.01%

-19.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.65%

-13.14%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.76%

-9.37%

-12.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.77%

10.66%

-5.89%

Volatility

FIQPX vs. WAINX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class Z (FIQPX) has a higher volatility of 9.95% compared to Wasatch Emerging India Fund (WAINX) at 5.72%. This indicates that FIQPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WAINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIQPXWAINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.95%

5.72%

+4.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.06%

14.49%

+8.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.40%

17.41%

+7.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.77%

17.43%

+6.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.49%

19.09%

+4.40%

FIQPX vs. WAINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIQPX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than WAINX's 1.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIQPX vs. WAINX - Dividend Comparison

FIQPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WAINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.03%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIQPX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class Z
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%12.82%6.63%5.47%6.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WAINX
Wasatch Emerging India Fund
29.03%29.17%20.19%4.23%1.15%4.29%0.00%0.32%6.95%2.91%1.06%1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIQPX and WAINX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIQPX has higher volatility (9.95%) compared to WAINX (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIQPX dropped -57.62% vs WAINX's -41.34%.

FIQPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIQPX and WAINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer