WAINX vs. MINDX

In the year-to-date period, WAINX achieves a -6.33% return, which is significantly higher than MINDX's -9.12% return. Over the past 10 years, WAINX has outperformed MINDX with an annualized return of 5.45%, while MINDX has yielded a comparatively lower -2.19% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

WAINX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than MINDX's 1.15% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Emerging India Fund (WAINX) and Matthews India Fund (MINDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current WAINX Sharpe Ratio is -0.60, which is comparable to the MINDX Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAINX and MINDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither WAINX nor MINDX has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum WAINX drawdown since its inception was -41.34%, smaller than the maximum MINDX drawdown of -74.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAINX and MINDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Wasatch Emerging India Fund (WAINX) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to Matthews India Fund (MINDX) at 4.37%. This indicates that WAINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.