FIQLX vs. FTIHX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FIQLX (Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z) and FTIHX (Fidelity Total International Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FIQLX is a Japan Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FTIHX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI (All Country World Index) ex USA Investable Market Index. Over the past 5 years, FIQLX returned 9.94%/yr vs 8.78%/yr for FTIHX. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FIQLX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for FTIHX.

Performance

FIQLX vs. FTIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIQLX achieves a 21.46% return, which is significantly higher than FTIHX's 12.99% return.

FIQLX

• 1D: 4.54%
• 1M: -2.13%
• 6M: 12.66%
• YTD: 21.46%
• 1Y: 36.46%
• 3Y*: 20.04%
• 5Y*: 9.94%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.98%

FTIHX

• 1D: 2.78%
• 1M: 0.15%
• 6M: 6.94%
• YTD: 12.99%
• 1Y: 27.75%
• 3Y*: 16.94%
• 5Y*: 8.78%
• 10Y*: 9.18%
• ALL TIME*: 9.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FIQLX Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FTIHX Fidelity Total International Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FIQLX vs. FTIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FIQLX Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z	21.46%	31.84%	7.43%	16.09%	-22.16%	3.32%	25.58%	25.93%	-11.46%
FTIHX Fidelity Total International Index Fund	12.99%	32.59%	4.98%	15.49%	-16.29%	8.45%	11.09%	21.50%	-7.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FIQLX and FTIHX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018	0.78

The correlation between FIQLX and FTIHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIQLX vs. FTIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIQLX

FIQLX Risk / Return Rank: 69
FIQLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FIQLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FIQLX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
FIQLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FIQLX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

FTIHX

FTIHX Risk / Return Rank: 73
FTIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FTIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FTIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FTIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FTIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIQLX vs. FTIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIQLX	FTIHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.65	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.27	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.30	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.90	2.35	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.37	8.76	+0.61

FIQLX vs. FTIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIQLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the FTIHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIQLX and FTIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIQLX vs. FTIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIQLX drawdown since its inception was -36.13%, roughly equal to the maximum FTIHX drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQLX and FTIHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIQLX	FTIHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.13%	-35.75%	-0.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.73%	-11.25%	-1.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.14%	-13.15%	-5.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.13%	-29.99%	-6.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.03%	-2.35%	-4.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.18%	-7.14%	-3.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.93%	3.01%	+0.92%

Volatility

FIQLX vs. FTIHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX) has a higher volatility of 8.50% compared to Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) at 5.38%. This indicates that FIQLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIQLX	FTIHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.50%	5.38%	+3.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.65%	14.23%	+5.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.52%	16.08%	+7.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.57%	15.60%	+4.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.12%	15.96%	+4.16%

FIQLX vs. FTIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIQLX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FTIHX's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIQLX vs. FTIHX - Dividend Comparison

FIQLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.27%, more than FTIHX's 2.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FIQLX Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z	8.27%	10.04%	5.04%	3.88%	0.00%	11.89%	1.97%	1.35%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%
FTIHX Fidelity Total International Index Fund	2.46%	2.78%	2.88%	2.78%	2.51%	2.55%	1.62%	2.61%	2.21%	0.45%	0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIQLX and FTIHX in my portfolio?

FIQLX and FTIHX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIQLX or FTIHX?

FIQLX has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to FTIHX (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIQLX dropped -36.13% vs FTIHX's -35.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.