PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIQKX vs. CIGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIQKX vs. CIGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class Z (FIQKX) and Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIQKX achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly lower than CIGIX's 34.54% return.


FIQKX

1D
0.40%
1M
2.86%
YTD
7.15%
6M
11.23%
1Y
23.65%
3Y*
21.61%
5Y*
12.32%
10Y*

CIGIX

1D
0.26%
1M
13.78%
YTD
34.54%
6M
37.88%
1Y
48.17%
3Y*
25.69%
5Y*
4.90%
10Y*
10.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIQKX vs. CIGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIQKX
Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class Z
7.15%43.69%5.00%19.30%-7.79%14.97%3.45%19.10%-10.92%
CIGIX
Calamos International Growth Fund
34.54%23.11%12.51%15.33%-30.54%-8.98%44.95%29.69%-11.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FIQKX and CIGIX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018

0.85

The correlation between FIQKX and CIGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIQKX vs. CIGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIQKX
FIQKX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
FIQKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQKX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQKX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

CIGIX
CIGIX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
CIGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CIGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIQKX vs. CIGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class Z (FIQKX) and Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIQKXCIGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.37

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

3.01

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.12

11.14

-3.02

FIQKX vs. CIGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIQKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the CIGIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIQKX and CIGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIQKXCIGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

2.09

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.23

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.38

+0.20

Drawdowns

FIQKX vs. CIGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIQKX drawdown since its inception was -38.64%, smaller than the maximum CIGIX drawdown of -64.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQKX and CIGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIQKXCIGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.64%

-64.46%

+25.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.37%

-15.88%

+5.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.55%

-19.38%

+4.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.46%

-50.15%

+22.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

0.00%

-1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

-15.29%

+9.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

4.28%

-1.48%

Volatility

FIQKX vs. CIGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class Z (FIQKX) is 4.72%, while Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX) has a volatility of 9.54%. This indicates that FIQKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIQKXCIGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

9.54%

-4.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.86%

19.73%

-7.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.70%

22.82%

-8.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.57%

21.07%

-4.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

19.98%

-0.71%

FIQKX vs. CIGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIQKX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than CIGIX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIQKX vs. CIGIX - Dividend Comparison

FIQKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than CIGIX's 10.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIGIX
Calamos International Growth Fund
10.02%13.49%4.54%0.28%0.00%0.33%5.42%0.00%13.25%3.76%0.00%0.13%
FIQKX
Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class Z
2.28%2.44%2.49%2.20%1.96%4.41%1.82%3.68%3.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIQKX and CIGIX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIGIX has higher volatility (9.54%) compared to FIQKX (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIQKX dropped -38.64% vs CIGIX's -64.46%.

CIGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIQKX and CIGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer