PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIQFX vs. TDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIQFX vs. TDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class Z (FIQFX) and Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. (TDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIQFX achieves a 38.76% return, which is significantly higher than TDF's -2.73% return.


FIQFX

1D
2.72%
1M
4.41%
YTD
38.76%
6M
40.25%
1Y
80.14%
3Y*
31.61%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*

TDF

1D
1.50%
1M
-1.18%
YTD
-2.73%
6M
-3.92%
1Y
14.90%
3Y*
8.64%
5Y*
-8.68%
10Y*
5.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIQFX vs. TDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIQFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class Z
38.76%42.75%23.34%-0.13%-23.76%-13.61%48.04%35.33%-1.81%
TDF
Templeton Dragon Fund Inc.
-2.73%37.70%5.44%-20.06%-32.93%-18.02%52.98%27.97%-2.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FIQFX and TDF is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.80

The correlation between FIQFX and TDF shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIQFX vs. TDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIQFX
FIQFX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FIQFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

TDF
TDF Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDF Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
TDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDF Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIQFX vs. TDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class Z (FIQFX) and Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. (TDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIQFXTDFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.16

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.30

1.07

+6.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.77

2.74

+19.03

FIQFX vs. TDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIQFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.44, which is higher than the TDF Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIQFX and TDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIQFX vs. TDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIQFX drawdown since its inception was -58.33%, smaller than the maximum TDF drawdown of -68.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQFX and TDF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIQFXTDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.33%

-68.15%

+9.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.78%

-13.95%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.98%

-28.25%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.34%

-61.85%

+9.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-47.19%

+46.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.29%

-22.60%

+0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

5.45%

-1.84%

Volatility

FIQFX vs. TDF - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class Z (FIQFX) has a higher volatility of 10.45% compared to Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. (TDF) at 6.14%. This indicates that FIQFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIQFXTDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.45%

6.14%

+4.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.69%

13.48%

+5.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.87%

18.42%

+4.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.51%

27.25%

-2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.23%

23.98%

+0.25%

Dividends

FIQFX vs. TDF - Dividend Comparison

FIQFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than TDF's 2.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIQFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class Z
1.49%2.07%1.58%2.14%0.86%11.06%4.98%0.84%1.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDF
Templeton Dragon Fund Inc.
2.76%3.55%1.36%0.00%12.73%14.13%24.72%10.75%12.43%7.95%10.34%22.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIQFX and TDF have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIQFX has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to TDF (6.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIQFX dropped -58.33% vs TDF's -68.15%.

FIQFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIQFX and TDF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer