FIQFX vs. FHKAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class Z (FIQFX) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX).
FIQFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018. FHKAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008.
Performance
FIQFX vs. FHKAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIQFX vs. FHKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIQFX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class Z | 5.55% | 42.75% | 23.34% | -0.13% | -23.76% | -13.61% | 48.04% | 35.33% | -1.81% |
FHKAX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A | 5.42% | 42.19% | 22.84% | -0.60% | -24.09% | -13.95% | 47.37% | 34.71% | -1.84% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FIQFX having a 5.55% return and FHKAX slightly lower at 5.42%.
FIQFX
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -9.02%
- YTD
- 5.55%
- 6M
- 6.33%
- 1Y
- 44.02%
- 3Y*
- 20.04%
- 5Y*
- 2.94%
- 10Y*
- —
FHKAX
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -9.06%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 6M
- 6.13%
- 1Y
- 43.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.54%
- 5Y*
- 2.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIQFX vs. FHKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIQFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than FHKAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIQFX vs. FHKAX — Risk / Return Rank
FIQFX
FHKAX
FIQFX vs. FHKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class Z (FIQFX) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIQFX | FHKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.87 | 1.85 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.42 | 2.39 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.34 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 2.48 | +0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.80 | 9.62 | +0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIQFX | FHKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 1.85 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.11 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.31 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIQFX and FHKAX is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIQFX vs. FHKAX - Dividend Comparison
FIQFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than FHKAX's 1.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIQFX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class Z | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.58% | 2.14% | 0.86% | 11.06% | 4.98% | 0.84% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FHKAX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A | 1.51% | 1.59% | 1.22% | 1.58% | 0.59% | 10.80% | 4.71% | 0.38% | 0.39% | 0.21% | 0.99% | 15.33% |
Drawdowns
FIQFX vs. FHKAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIQFX drawdown since its inception was -58.33%, roughly equal to the maximum FHKAX drawdown of -58.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQFX and FHKAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIQFX | FHKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.33% | -58.62% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.95% | -15.97% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.73% | -54.04% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.78% | -10.83% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.90% | -19.15% | -3.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.11% | 4.12% | -0.01% |
Volatility
FIQFX vs. FHKAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class Z (FIQFX) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) have volatilities of 9.26% and 9.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIQFX | FHKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.26% | 9.26% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.44% | 16.44% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.17% | 23.16% | +0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.96% | 23.95% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.05% | 22.09% | +1.96% |